The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selective Attention and Priming: Inhibitory and Facilitatory Effects of Ignored Primes
Abstract
The priming effects of ignored information have been studied in Stroop displays (Neill, 1977) and with spatially superimposed drawings (Tipper, in this issue); naming of probes related to ignored primes is delayed in these experiments (“negative priming”). This negative priming effect is confirmed in a list reading task in Experiment 1, which used partially superimposed letters, and Experiment 2, which used spatially separated letters. Furthermore, Lowe (1979) using Stroop colour words observed that changing the nature of the probe such that it did not require selection from a competing word reversed the priming effects of the ignored word from inhibition to facilitation. Experiment 3 confirmed this observation when subjects selected a red letter from a green letter. Two models are suggested to account for this result. In the first, negative priming is a product of the ignored prime and subsequent probe being encoded both as a stimulus to be ignored and one to be named (Allport, Tipper and Chmiel, in press; Lowe, in press). This dual encoding is ambiguous, requiring further processing before response can be output. The other model suggests that negative priming reflects inhibition of response to ignored information, slowing naming latencies to probe stimuli that require the same response. Experiment 4 attempts to differentiate between the models, and the latter inhibition view is preferred.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
Posner, M. I. (1980) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/00335558008248231 · Cited by 9,670
The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior
Easterbrook, J. A. (1959) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0047707 · Cited by 3,090 · cited 2×
“Subjects were shown the six letters to be named in the experiment and examples of the experimental stimuli. They were told that the task was to read down the list of red letters, ignoring the green, as fast as possible. Accuracy was also emphasized, and subjects were told to avoid making mistakes. This emphasis on acc…”
Background
Cited by
A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.122 · Cited by 4,153
Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases
Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x02000018 · Cited by 4,126
Inhibition and impulsivity: behavioral and neural basis of response control
Bari, A., & Robbins, T. W. (2013) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.06.005 · Cited by 1,921
The effects of emotion on attention: A review of attentional processing of emotional information
Yiend, J. (2010) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930903205698 · Cited by 891
Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention
Lavie, N., & Tsal, Y. (1994) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03213897 · Cited by 870
Feature binding, attention and object perception
Treisman, A. (1998) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0284 · Cited by 754
Consciousness and the varieties of emotion experience: A theoretical framework.
Lambie, J. A., & Marcel, A. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.2.219 · Cited by 760
“Regarding the latter, much experimental research on attention shows that, when there is competition for attention, rejected representations receive "negative priming" which impedes their subsequent accessibility for awareness (Tipper & Cranston, 1985; Fox, 1995).”
BackgroundHalf a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163 · Cited by 5,500
Preattentive Object Files: Shapeless Bundles of Basic Features
WOLFE, J. M., & BENNETT, S. C. (1997) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(96)00111-3 · Cited by 349
Rogers, R. (1998) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/121.5.815 · Cited by 312
Cognitive Gerontology and Attentional Inhibition: A Reply to Burke and McDowd
Zacks, R., & Hasher, L. (1997) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/52b.6.p274 · Cited by 220
Working memory and Stroop interference: An individual differences investigation
Long, D. L., & Prat, C. S. (2002) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03195290 · Cited by 165
Inhibition and Interference in Selective Attention: Some Tests of a Neural Network Model
Houghton, G., Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Shore, D. I. (1996) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/713756733 · Cited by 144
Self-citationConflict resolution in the Eriksen flanker task: Similarities and differences to the Simon task
Hübner, R., & Töbel, L. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0214203 · Cited by 99
Ellenbogen, M. A., Linnen, A.-M., Cardoso, C., & Joober, R. (2013) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.06.016 · Cited by 53
Ciesielski, K. T., Rowland, L. M., Harris, R. J., Kerwin, A. A., Reeve, A., & Knight, J. E. (2011) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2010.05.027 · Cited by 32
Dorahy, M. J., Irwin, H. J., & Middleton, W. (2002) · Journal of Trauma & Dissociation · doi:10.1300/j229v03n03_07 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Tipper, S. P., & Cranston, M.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1985-11
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 591-611
- ISSN
- 0272-4987 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0740
- OpenAlex
- W2074058697
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
