Cited by 220Aging and Gerontology ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

Cognitive Gerontology and Attentional Inhibition: A Reply to Burke and McDowd

Zacks, R., Hasher, L.·1997·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

Our response to the Burke and McDowd critiques (in this issue) begins with a history of the origins of the inhibitory deficit view and of its development since 1988 as well as with an account of some particularly useful findings and of our preferred mode of theory building, which is nonformal and empirically driven. Against this background, we find many points of agreement with Burke and McDowd but also many points of disagreement. For example, we agree with Burke that many aspects of language comprehension and production are age invariant, but we disagree that all such findings count against our viewpoint. Likewise, we readily acknowledge the problems in measuring inhibition that McDowd so clearly documents, but do not feel that this is a fatal problem as long as the inhibitory deficit view continues to be viable within the basic attentional literature, continues to permit the integration of a large body of existing data, and continues to generate new predictions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/52b.6.p274

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to Zacks and Hasher, there are three inhibitory functions: the access function, the deletion function, and the restrain function.

    “According to Zacks and Hasher (1997), there are three inhibitory functions: the “access function”, which limits access to the WM to those with direct relevance to the task, the “deletion function” removes information from the WM that is irrelevant, inappropriate, or becomes irrelevant due to changes in goals or demands. Finally, the “restrain function” stops the emission of strong responses.”

    From Assessment of executive functions in school-aged children: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as Zacks and Hasher (1997)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zacks, R., & Hasher, L.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Zacks, R.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
1997-11-01
Volume
52B
Issue
6
Pages
P274-P283
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2168945832
Cited by
220
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 16
FWCI
12.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AGO4306, AGO-2753)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
attentional inhibition, cognitive aging, older adults, language comprehension, language production, age invariance, theory development
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Cognition Disorders, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review