Cited by 754Visual perception and processing mechanismsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionMultisensory perception and integration

Feature binding, attention and object perception

Open access
Treisman, Anne·1998·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

The seemingly effortless ability to perceive meaningful objects in an integrated scene actually depends on complex visual processes. The 'binding problem' concerns the way in which we select and integrate the separate features of objects in the correct combinations. Experiments suggest that attention plays a central role in solving this problem. Some neurological patients show a dramatic breakdown in the ability to see several objects; their deficits suggest a role for the parietal cortex in the binding process. However, indirect measures of priming and interference suggest that more information may be implicitly available than we can consciously access.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.1998.0284

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Treisman, A.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Treisman, Anne
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
1998-08-29
Volume
353
Issue
1373
Pages
1295-1306
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2111990464
Cited by
754
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 40
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
feature binding, binding problem, visual attention, object perception, feature integration, parietal cortex, visual priming, interference, implicit information, neurological patients
MeSH terms
Attention, Humans, Parietal Lobe, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychomotor Performance, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review