Cited by 165Cognitive Functions and MemoryBehavioral Health and InterventionsEnvironmental Education and Sustainability

Changing behavior by memory aids: A social psychological model of prospective memory and habit development tested with dynamic field data.

Tobias, Robert·2009·Psychological Review

Abstract

This article presents a social psychological model of prospective memory and habit development. The model is based on relevant research literature, and its dynamics were investigated by computer simulations. Time-series data from a behavior-change campaign in Cuba were used for calibration and validation of the model. The model scored well in several system-analytical tests, including the replication of the data and the forecast of later developments based on earlier data. Additionally, the calibrated parameter values indicate that the accessibilities of intentions decay at the same rate as retrospective memories. However, the accessibilities may stay high due to a reminder, the effectiveness of which depends on a person's commitment to performing the behavior. Furthermore, the effect of the reminder decays over time. This decay is much slower than the development of habits, which, after about a month, were nearly fully developed if the person had executed the behavior sufficiently often. Finally, over time, habits were shown to replace the reminding effect of the external memory aid. This article points to a new understanding of the role of habits in supporting the performance of repeated behaviors through remembering.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0015512

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More passive reminders in the form of physical signs, although helpful in prompting initial repetition and habit formation, ultimately lost potency over time.

    “More passive reminders in the form of physical signs, although helpful in prompting initial repetition and habit formation, ultimately lost potency over time (Tobias 2009).”

    From Psychology of Habit. (2016) · cites this paper as Tobias 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tobias, R.
Affiliations
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH)
Corresponding author
Tobias, Robert
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
2009
Volume
116
Issue
2
Pages
408-438
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2154133520
Cited by
165
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
10.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • DORA Eawag (Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag)) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
Keywords
prospective memory, habit formation, memory aids, behavior change, social-psychological model, computer simulation, memory decay, reminders, behavior change campaigns, Cuba
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Conservation of Natural Resources, Cuba, Habits, Humans, Memory, Models, Psychological, Reproducibility of Results, Reminder Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review