The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition
Abstract
A framework is outlined in which individual faces are assumed to be encoded as a point in a multidimensional space, defined by dimensions that serve to discriminate faces. It is proposed that such a framework can account for the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race on recognition of faces. Two specific models within this framework are identified: a norm-based coding model, in which faces are encoded as vectors from a population norm or prototype; and a purely exemplar-based model. Both models make similar predictions, albeit in different ways, concerning the interactions between the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and race. These predictions were supported in five experiments in which photographs of faces served as stimuli. The norm-based coding version and the exemplar-based version of the framework cannot be distinguished on the basis of the experiments reported, but it is argued that a multidimensional space provides a useful heuristic framework to investigate recognition of faces. Finally, the relationship between the specific models is considered and an implementation in terms of parallel distributed processing is briefly discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fodor, J. A. (1983) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001 · Cited by 7,734
Context theory of classification learning
Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.3.207 · Cited by 3,061
Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.
Mandler, G. (1980) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.87.3.252 · Cited by 2,849
Yin, R. K. (1969) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027474 · Cited by 2,624
Cited by
Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: a meta-analytic review
Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001) · Psychology, Public Policy, and Law · doi:10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.3 · Cited by 1,204
Precise minds in uncertain worlds: Predictive coding in autism.
Van de Cruys, S., Evers, K., Van der Hallen, R., Van Eylen, L., Boets, B., de-Wit, L., & Wagemans, J. (2014) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0037665 · Cited by 885
Freiwald, W. A., & Tsao, D. Y. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1194908 · Cited by 678
Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions
Todorov, A., Said, C. P., Engell, A. D., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.001 · Cited by 706
The Code for Facial Identity in the Primate Brain
Chang, L., & Tsao, D. Y. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.011 · Cited by 644
Metadata
- Authors
- Valentine, T.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991-05
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-204
- ISSN
- 0272-4987 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0740
- OpenAlex
- W2059265105
- Cited by
- 1,386
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 4.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14640749108400966
- The paper
- Valentine, T. (1991). A Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749108400966
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.