CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 211Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismPhonetics and Phonology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Orthography are Independent of Phonology in Masked form Priming

Open access
Ferrand, Ludovic, Grainger, Jonathan·1994·The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
DOI 10.1080/14640749408401116
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Briefly presented forward-masked primes that share letters with a word target have been shown to facilitate performance in different word recognition tasks. However, in all the experiments that have previously reported these facilitatory effects, related primes not only shared more letters with the target than did unrelated primes (orthographic priming), but they also shared more phonemes (phonological priming). The stimuli used in the present experiments allow us to separate out the effects of orthographic priming from phonological priming. Varying prime exposure duration from 14 to 57 msec, it is shown that effects of orthography follow a distinct time-course from the effects of phonology, and that orthographic facilitation does not result from a confound with phonological prime-target overlap.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14640749408401116

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Forster K. I., 1976, New approaches to language mechanisms., 257
  2. 10.1037/0096-1523.19.5.951 · DOI
  3. Humphreys G. W., 1987, Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading., 105
  4. 10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1174 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Johnson N. F., 1977, Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension., 91
  6. 10.1037/0096-1523.17.4.951 · DOI
  7. 1971, Trésor de la langue française (French language frequency counts)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 211

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • EHESS/CNRS and René Descartes University, Paris, France
ORCID
Ferrand, Ludovic
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1994-05
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
365-382
ISSN
  • 0272-4987 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0740
DOI
10.1080/14640749408401116
OpenAlex
W2008196621
Cited by
210
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • HAL AMU (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
orthographic priming, phonological priming, masked priming, forward masking, word recognition
MeSH terms
Humans, Language, Phonetics, Photic Stimulation, Mental Recall, Time Factors, Visual Perception, Writing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review