CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 220Reading and Literacy DevelopmentPhonetics and Phonology ResearchNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

The role of syllables in perceptual processing

Spoehr, Kathryn Troyer, Smith, Edward E·1973·Cognitive Psychology
DOI 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90026-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90026-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If words were parsed into syllabic units early in processing, then long words might be susceptible to influence from syllabically defined neighbors via mechanisms similar to those underlying N effects for monosyllabic words.

    “If, for example, words were parsed into syllabic units early in processing (Spoehr & Smith, 1973;Taft, 1979), then long words might be susceptible to influence from syllabically defined neighbors via mechanisms similar to those underlying N effects for monosyllabic words.”

    From The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts (1997) · cites this paper as Spoehr & Smith, 1973

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spoehr, K. T., & Smith, E. E.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Edward E
Venue
Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1973-07
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
71-89
ISSN
0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0010-0285(73)90026-1
OpenAlex
W2035866704
Cited by
220
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
21.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
syllables, word perception, number perception, word length effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review