Cited by 24Endometriosis Research and TreatmentIntestinal and Peritoneal AdhesionsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Pathogenesis of endometriosis--current research

Witz, Craig A., Allsup, Karen T., Montoya-Rodriguez, Iris A., Vaughan, Shelby L., Centonze, Victoria E., Schenken, Robert S.·2003·Human Fertility

Abstract

Proliferative, secretory and menstrual endometrial cells of both the stroma and epithelium adhere to intact peritoneal mesothelium and mesothelial monolayers. Endometrial attachment to the mesothelium appears to occur rapidly (within 1 h) and transmesothelial invasion occurs between 1 and 18-24 h. These results demonstrate that the mesothelium is not a 'no-stick' surface and indicates that molecules present at the surface of the mesothelium are involved in the pathogenesis of the early endometriotic lesion. The inhibition of endometrial cell adherence to peritoneal mesothelium by hyaluronidase indicates that CD44-hyaluronan binding is at least one of the mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. We believe that investigation of mesothelial cell adhesion molecules is central to understanding the pathogenesis of endometriosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1464770312331368973

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Th2 lymphocytes gain an advantage in women with endometriosis.

    “According to literature data, Th2 lymphocytes gain an advantage in women with endometriosis [79].”
  • Sampson observed tubal reflux of menstrual shedding at the time of menstruation, but never reported the early stage of endometrial attachment to the mesothelium and invasion as documented by Witz et al. in experimental conditions.

    “It is important to note that although Sampson observed tubal reflux of menstrual shedding (7) at the time of menstruation, but never reported the early stage of endometrial attachment to the mesothelium and invasion as documented by Witz et al. (32) in experimental conditions.”

    From Pathogenesis of deep endometriosis (2017) · cites this paper as [32]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Witz, C. A., Allsup, K. T., Montoya-Rodriguez, I. A., Vaughan, S. L., Centonze, V. E., & Schenken, R. S.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Venue
Human Fertility
Published
2003-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
34-40
ISSN
  • 1464-7273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-8149
OpenAlex
W2059799829
Cited by
24
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Fertility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis pathogenesis, peritoneal mesothelium, CD44, hyaluronic acid, hyaluronidase
MeSH terms
Cell Adhesion, Endometriosis, Epithelial Cells, Epithelium, Female, Humans, Hyaluronic Acid, Hyaluronoglucosaminidase, Menstruation, Peritoneum, Stromal Cells, Hyaluronan Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review