Cited by 23Higher Education Governance and DevelopmentDiaspora, migration, transnational identityMigration and Exile Studies

Hierarchies and categorical power in cross-border science: analysing scientists’ transnational mobility between Ukraine and Germany

Amelina, Anna·2013·Southeast European and Black Sea Studies

Abstract

Using the results of qualitative research in Germany and Ukraine, the article provides evidence to how the short-term and circular geographic mobility of Ukrainian natural scientists between Ukraine and Germany contributes to the formation of a cross-border scientific field. Combining Bourdieu’s field theory with the transnational field approach and the intersectional perspective, the article indicates how unequal access to scientific reputation is structured across borders. In sum, the complex interplay of ethnicity-, class- and gender-related categorizations pushes mobile scientists to define themselves as an exploited elite. At the same time, female mobile scientists are identified as having the most disadvantaged positions in the transnational academic hierarchy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14683857.2013.789670

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amelina, A.
Affiliations
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Amelina, Anna
Venue
Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
Published
2013-06
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
141-155
ISSN
  • 1468-3857 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9639
OpenAlex
W2077454562
Cited by
23
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Higher Education Governance and Development
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
Keywords
international academic mobility, Ukrainian scientists, academic hierarchy, Bourdieu's field theory, transnational fields, intersectionality, scientific reputation, gender inequality in academia, class inequality, ethnicity, exploitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review