Cited by 50Climate Change Policy and EconomicsInternational Environmental Law and PoliciesSustainability and Climate Change Governance

A dual-track transition to global carbon pricing

Open access
van den Bergh, Jeroen C. J. M., Angelsen, Arild, Baranzini, Andrea, Botzen, W. J. W., Carattini, Stefano, Drews, Stefan, Dunlop, Tessa, Galbraith, Eric +5 more·2020·Climate Policy

Abstract

Unilateral climate policies have been unable to achieve intended emissions reductions. We argue that international harmonization of climate policy beyond the Paris Agreement is the only way forward and that global carbon pricing, either through a tax or market, is the best available instrument to manage this. A foundation has already been laid, as current carbon pricing initiatives cover about 20% of global CO2 emissions. Since it limits free-riding by countries/jurisdictions, global carbon pricing is, in principle, behaviourally easier to negotiate than other instruments, such as emission targets or technical standards. To overcome political resistance, we propose a dynamic strategy consisting of two parallel tracks and five transition phases. The first track entails assembly of a carbon-pricing coalition that expands over time and exerts moral and economic pressure on non-members to join. The second track involves refocusing UN intergovernmental climate change negotiations on carbon pricing, potentially involving initially heterogeneous prices reflecting distinct income levels of countries, which then gradually converge. The dual tracks are designed to reinforce one another, increasing the likelihood of a successful outcome. The proposal results in a transition trajectory consisting of two interactive tracks and five phases, with specific attention to inequity within and among countries. We illustrate how such an approach could function with either a carbon tax or market.Key policy insights International harmonization of climate policies is required to achieve the deep cuts in emissions needed to meet the Paris Agreement’s 2°C or 1.5°C target.A focus on carbon pricing – either through taxation or emissions trading – has multiple strengths: it can be easily compared and harmonized among countries; it can be gradually strengthened over time; it moderates freeriding and fear of competitiveness losses; and it automatically generates revenues to compensate low-income households and countries.Formation of a carbon-pricing coalition would enable such a group to speak with a single, powerful voice at UN climate change conferences. It would put economic and moral pressure on non-members, stimulating them to join and show a constructive attitude in ongoing UN climate change negotiations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14693062.2020.1797618

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dual track approaches proposed for carbon pricing and convergence seem doomed to fail.

    “A global agreement on commoncarbon pricing is evidently impossible, and even 'dual track' approaches proposed for carbon pricing and convergence (173) seem 'doomed to fail' (174).”

    From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [173]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., Angelsen, A., Baranzini, A., Botzen, W. J. W., Carattini, S., Drews, S., Dunlop, T., Galbraith, E., Gsottbauer, E., Howarth, R. B., Padilla, E., Roca, J., & Schmidt, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Environmental Science and Technology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
  • HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (CH)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Joint Research Centre (IT)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
  • Universität Innsbruck (AT)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • FernUniversität in Hagen (DE)
Venue
Climate Policy
Published
2020-07-31
Volume
20
Issue
9
Pages
1057-1069
ISSN
  • 1469-3062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-7457
OpenAlex
W3044774837
Cited by
50
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3
FWCI
6.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Climate Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ArODES (HES-SO (https://www.hes-so.ch/)) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (“María de Maeztu” program MDM-2015-0552)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Forderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (P2SKP1_165028)
  • H2020 European Research Council (741087)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › International Environmental Law and Policies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Keywords
carbon tax, emissions trading, Paris Agreement, UN climate negotiations, free-riding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review