Comparing policies to combat emissions leakage: Border carbon adjustments versus rebates
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As a result, a default emissions rate would most probably have to be calculated based on industry- or technology-specific average measures of embodied carbon.
“As a result, a default emissions rate would most probably have to be calculated based on industry-or technology-specific average measures of embodied carbon 23,24 .”
From Potential impacts and challenges of border carbon adjustments (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
Cites
Border tax adjustment: a feasible way to support stringent emission trading
Ismer, R., & Neuhoff, K. (2007) · European Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10657-007-9032-8 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Addressing leakage in the EU ETS: Border adjustment or output-based allocation?
Monjon, S., & Quirion, P. (2011) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.020 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
EU emissions trading and the cement sector: a spatial competition analysis
PONSSARD, J. P., & WALKER, N. (2008) · Climate Policy · doi:10.3763/cpol.2007.0500 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Demailly, D., & Quirion, P. (2006) · Climate Policy · doi:10.3763/cpol.2006.0606 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bataille, C., Åhman, M., Neuhoff, K., Nilsson, L. J., Fischedick, M., Lechtenböhmer, S., Solano-Rodriquez, B., Denis-Ryan, A., Stiebert, S., Waisman, H., et al. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.107 · Cited by 680 · see citing works
Potential impacts and challenges of border carbon adjustments
Böhringer, C., Fischer, C., Rosendahl, K. E., & Rutherford, T. F. (2022) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-021-01250-z · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Self-citationSteininger, K., Lininger, C., Droege, S., Roser, D., Tomlinson, L., & Meyer, L. (2014) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.10.005 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Cosbey, A., Droege, S., Fischer, C., & Munnings, C. (2019) · Review of Environmental Economics and Policy · doi:10.1093/reep/rey020 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Self-citationAddressing leakage in the EU ETS: Border adjustment or output-based allocation?
Monjon, S., & Quirion, P. (2011) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.020 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
The Strategic Value of Carbon Tariffs
Böhringer, C., Carbone, J. C., & Rutherford, T. F. (2016) · American Economic Journal: Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.20130327 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Goulder, L. H., Long, X., Lu, J., & Morgenstern, R. D. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102561 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Cost-effective unilateral climate policy design: Size matters
Böhringer, C., Fischer, C., & Rosendahl, K. E. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2013.12.008 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Self-citationTHE IMPACTS OF THE EU ETS ON NORWEGIAN PLANTS’ ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
KLEMETSEN, M., ROSENDAHL, K. E., & JAKOBSEN, A. L. (2020) · Climate Change Economics · doi:10.1142/s2010007820500062 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
McAusland, C., & Najjar, N. (2015) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-013-9749-5 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Targeted carbon tariffs: Export response, leakage and welfare
Böhringer, C., Bye, B., Fæhn, T., & Rosendahl, K. E. (2017) · Resource and Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2017.06.003 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
A dual-track transition to global carbon pricing
van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., Angelsen, A., Baranzini, A., Botzen, W. J. W., Carattini, S., Drews, S., Dunlop, T., Galbraith, E., Gsottbauer, E., Howarth, R. B., et al. (2020) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2020.1797618 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fischer, C., & Fox, A. K.
- Affiliations
- Resources For The Future (US)
- United States International Trade Commission (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fischer, Carolyn
- ORCID
- Fischer, Carolyn
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-216
- ISSN
- 0095-0696 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3123651773
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 64.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
- Keywords
- emissions leakage, border carbon adjustment, international competitiveness, greenhouse gas regulation, international trade law, energy-intensive industries, elasticity of substitution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
