Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The wheel of business model reinvention: how to reshape your business model to leapfrog competitors

Voelpel †, Sven C., Leibold, Marius, Tekie, Eden B.·2004·Journal of Change Management
DOI 10.1080/1469701042000212669
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In today's rapidly changing business landscape, new sources of sustainable competitive advantage can often only be attained from business model reinvention that is based on disruptive innovation and not on incremental change or continuous improvement. Extant literature indicates that business models and their reinvention have recently been the focus of scholarly investigations in the field of strategic management, especially focusing on the search for new bases of building strategic competitive advantage, not only to outperform competitors but to especially leapfrog them into new areas of competitive advantage. While the available results indicate that progress is made on clarifying the nature and key dimensions of business models, relatively little guidance of how to reshape business models and its organizational fitness dimensions have emerged. This article presents a systemic framework for business model reinvention, illustrates its key dimensions, and proposes a systemic operationalization process. Moreover, it provides a tool that helps organizations to evaluate both existing and proposed new business models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1469701042000212669

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Creating the boundaryless organization

    Ashkenas, R. (1999) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/s0007-6813(99)80069-x · Cited by 42 · cited 2×

    “The discontinuities that differentiate the ‘new’ economy from the ‘old’ are numerous but to mention the prominent ones, these include: digitization of information (Viscio and Paternack, 1996; Tapscott, 1997); the ‘virtual space’ where economic transactions are increasingly taking place (Kelly, 1998); relying more on k…”
    Background

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.1002/smj.187 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bartlett C, 2000, Harvard Business Review, 78, pp. 132–42
  3. Beinhocker E, 1997, The McKinsey Quarterly, pp. 24–39
  4. Beinhocker E, 1999, Sloan Management Review, 40, pp. 95–106
  5. Boulding W, 2001, Harvard Business Review, 79, pp. 20–1
  6. Bradley S, 1998, Sense & Respond — Capturing Value in the Network Era, Harvard Business School Press
  7. Christensen C, 1997, The Innovator's Dilemma — When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Harvard Business School Press
  8. 10.1108/13673270110400816 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Evans P, 1997, Harvard Business Review, 75, pp. 71–82
  10. Evans P, 2000, Blown to Bits — How the New Economies of Information Transforms Strategy, Harvard Business School Press
  11. Fiorina C, 2000, Executive Excellence, 17, pp. 5–6
  12. Gibbert M, 2003, European Management Journal, 20, pp. 459–69
  13. 10.1108/14691930110385900 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0007-6813(01)80041-0 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/1467-8616.00062 · DOI
  16. Hamel G, 2000, Leading the Revolution, Harvard Business School Press
  17. Harari O, 1996, Management Review, 85, pp. 51–3
  18. 10.1002/smj.196 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/S0007-6813(01)80042-2 · doi:10.1016/s0007-6813(01)80042-2
  20. Kelly K, 1998, New Rules for the New Economy—10 Radical Strategies for a Connected World, Viking Penguin
  21. Leibold M, 2002, Strategic Management in the Knowledge Economy: New Approaches and Business Applications, Wiley
  22. Lissack M, 2001, Long Range Planning, 34, pp. 52–70, 10.1016/S0024-6301(00)00093-5 · DOI
  23. Moore J, 1993, Harvard Business Review, 71, pp. 75–86
  24. Normann R, 1993, Harvard Business Review, 71, pp. 65–77
  25. Pascale R, 1999, Sloan Management Review, 40, pp. 83–94
  26. Pascale R, 1997, Harvard Business Review, 75, pp. 126–39
  27. Prahalad C, 1999, Sloan Management Review, 40, pp. 31–9
  28. Prahalad C, 2000, Harvard Business Review, 78, pp. 79–87
  29. 10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00015-8 · DOI
  30. Schmid B, 2001, Electronic Markets, 11, pp. 3–9
  31. Schumpeter J, 1943, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Allen and Unwin
  32. Senge P, 2001, MIT Sloan Management Review, 42, pp. 24–38
  33. Sull D, 1999, Harvard Business Review, 77, pp. 42–52
  34. Sveiby K, 1997, The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets, Berrett-Koehler
  35. 10.1108/eb054601 · doi:10.1108/eb054601
  36. 10.1080/10196789800000016 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1108/eb040168 · DOI
  38. Useem J, 1999, Fortune, 140, pp. 121–34
  39. Viscio A, 1996, Strategy & Business, 20
  40. Voelpel S, 2002, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3, pp. 118–27
  41. Voelpel S, 2003, IFPM
  42. Von Krogh G, 2001, Sloan Management Review, 42, pp. 53–61
  43. 10.1108/eb054595 · doi:10.1108/eb054595
  44. 10.1108/10878570010380002 · doi:10.1108/10878570010380002

Cited by

See all 308

Metadata

Authors
Voelpel †, S. C., Leibold, M., & Tekie, E. B.
Venue
Journal of Change Management
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2004-09
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
259-276
ISSN
  • 1469-7017 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-1811
DOI
10.1080/1469701042000212669
OpenAlex
W2087428969
Cited by
308
References
1
FWCI
22.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The wheel of business model reinvention: how to reshape your business model to leapfrog competitors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1469701042000212669
The paper
Voelpel †, S. C., Leibold, M., & Tekie, E. B. (2004). The wheel of business model reinvention: how to reshape your business model to leapfrog competitors. Journal of Change Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/1469701042000212669

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.