The DOI matches its Crossref record; 118 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Public Leadership: A review of the literature and framework for future research
Abstract
This study analyses and reviews the literature on public leadership with a novel combination of bibliometric methods. We detect four generic approaches to public leadership (i.e. a functionalist, a behavioural, a biographical and a reformist approach) which differ with regard to their philosophy of science (i.e. objective vs subjective) and level of analysis (i.e. micro-level vs multi-level). From our findings, we derive four directions for future research which involve shifting the focus from the aspect of ‘leadership’ to the element of ‘public’, from simplicity to complexity, from universalism to cultural relativism and from public leadership to public followership.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-6637 · Cited by 16,594
Gamst, F. C. (1991) · Anthropology of Work Review · doi:10.1525/awr.1991.12.3.19 · Cited by 7,932
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5 · Cited by 7,299
Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents
Small, H. (1973) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/asi.4630240406 · Cited by 5,345
Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis.
Jolliffe, I. T., & Greenacre, M. J. (1986) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531266 · Cited by 3,004
Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers
Kessler, M. M. (1963) · American Documentation · doi:10.1002/asi.5090140103 · Cited by 2,855
Models of core/periphery structures
Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (2000) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/s0378-8733(99)00019-2 · Cited by 2,219
Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (2021) · Cited by 2,202
Relational leadership theory: exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing
Uhl-Bien, M. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007 · Cited by 1,973
(1990) · Internet Archive (Internet Archive) · Cited by 1,850
Cited by
Is Metaverse in education a blessing or a curse: a combined content and bibliometric analysis
Tlili, A., Huang, R., Shehata, B., Liu, D., Zhao, J., Metwally, A. H. S., Wang, H., Denden, M., Bozkurt, A., Lee, L.-H., et al. (2022) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-022-00205-x · Cited by 624
Conceptualizing and Measuring Transformational and Transactional Leadership
Jensen, U. T., Andersen, L. B., Bro, L. L., Bøllingtoft, A., Eriksen, T. L. M., Holten, A.-L., Jacobsen, C. B., Ladenburg, J., Nielsen, P. A., Salomonsen, H. H., et al. (2019) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/0095399716667157 · Cited by 323
Ospina, S. M. (2017) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12706 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Vogel, R., & Masal, D.
- Venue
- Public Management Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-03-20
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1165-1189
- ISSN
- 1461-667X (ISSN-L)
- 1471-9037
- 1471-9045
- OpenAlex
- W2023453319
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 118
- FWCI
- 58.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Public Leadership: A review of the literature and framework for future research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14719037.2014.895031
- The paper
- Vogel, R., & Masal, D. (2015). Public Leadership: A review of the literature and framework for future research. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.895031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
