Cited by 201Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Compassion focused therapy: a systematic review of its effectiveness and acceptability in clinical populations

Open access
Craig, Catriona, Hiskey, Syd, Spector, Aimee·2020·Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics

Abstract

Introduction: Compassion focused therapy (CFT) is an increasingly popular therapeutic modality. Its holistic and integrative approach to universal human suffering means that it is well placed as a transdiagnostic therapy. Research into its effectiveness and acceptability has increased over the previous 10 years as the therapy has evolved, and to help consider its status as an evidence-based therapy research concerning its treatment outcomes needs evaluating.Areas covered: This paper reviews research investigating the effectiveness of CFT in clinical populations.Expert opinion: CFT shows promise for a range of mental health problems, especially when delivered in a group format over at least 12 hours. This is important for funding bodies and commissioning groups to consider as they allocate healthcare resources in light of current evidence-based practice. CFT is demonstrably well accepted by clients and clinicians and there is now a clear need for an updated, universally deployed, standard manual to direct future research. This will be critical in enabling widespread implementation and further adoption into mainstream clinical practice, will address the lack of standardization in the current research, and pave the way for further randomized control trials aimed at reducing existing methodological limitations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14737175.2020.1746184

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. LeDoux J, 1998, The emotional brain
  2. Carlyle M, 2019, J Subst Abuse Treat, 13, 1
  3. Noorbala F, 2013, Iran J Psychiatry, 8, 113
  4. Beaumont E, 2012, Couns Psychol Rev, 27, 31
  5. World Health Organization, 2016, ICD-11 Beta Draft (Joint Linearization for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics)
  6. Bargh J, 2017, Before you know it: the unconscious reasons we do what we do
  7. Anstiss T, 2017, The wiley blackwell handbook of the psychology of positivity and strengths‐based approaches at work
  8. West M, 2017, Caring to change: how compassionate leadership can stimulate innovation in health care

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 200

Metadata

Authors
Craig, C., Hiskey, S., & Spector, A.
Affiliations
  • Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Oaks Hospital (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Craig, Catriona
Venue
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Published
2020-04-02
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
385-400
ISSN
  • 1473-7175 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8360
OpenAlex
W3011072785
Cited by
201
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
compassion-focused therapy, treatment effectiveness, acceptability, transdiagnostic treatment, group therapy, mental illness, evidence-based practice, healthcare resource allocation
MeSH terms
Empathy, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Psychotherapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review