The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Compassion focused therapy: a systematic review of its effectiveness and acceptability in clinical populations
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Compassion focused therapy (CFT) is an increasingly popular therapeutic modality. Its holistic and integrative approach to universal human suffering means that it is well placed as a transdiagnostic therapy. Research into its effectiveness and acceptability has increased over the previous 10 years as the therapy has evolved, and to help consider its status as an evidence-based therapy research concerning its treatment outcomes needs evaluating.Areas covered: This paper reviews research investigating the effectiveness of CFT in clinical populations.Expert opinion: CFT shows promise for a range of mental health problems, especially when delivered in a group format over at least 12 hours. This is important for funding bodies and commissioning groups to consider as they allocate healthcare resources in light of current evidence-based practice. CFT is demonstrably well accepted by clients and clinicians and there is now a clear need for an updated, universally deployed, standard manual to direct future research. This will be critical in enabling widespread implementation and further adoption into mainstream clinical practice, will address the lack of standardization in the current research, and pave the way for further randomized control trials aimed at reducing existing methodological limitations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A systematic review published after initiation of the present study found that the efficacy of CFT was asso ciated with the number of treatment sessions, namely that minimally 12 sessions seemed to be required to achieve positive change across various populations (Craig et al., 2020).”
From Group-based compassion-focused therapy for prolonged grief symptoms in adults – Results from a randomized controlled trial (2022) · cites this paper as Craig et al., 2020
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This growing body of literature has been synthesized in several systematic reviews, which generally conclude that CFT appears efficacious in treating a range of clinical populations, although the existing studies vary considerably in terms of study quality and content of the therapeutic intervention and -format (Beaumont and Martin, 2015; Craig et al., 2020; Leaviss and Uttley, 2015).”
From Group-based compassion-focused therapy for prolonged grief symptoms in adults – Results from a randomized controlled trial (2022) · cites this paper as Craig et al., 2020
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Craig et al. (2020) also found more empirical support for group-based CFT compared to individually delivered CFT.”
From Group-based compassion-focused therapy for prolonged grief symptoms in adults – Results from a randomized controlled trial (2022) · cites this paper as Craig et al., 2020
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Despite the limitations, this service evaluation utilised a mixed methods approach which provided rich and useful insight into clients' experiences of the CMT group intervention, strengthening the overall evaluation (Craig et al. 2020; NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement 2005).”
From A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Compassionate Mind Training Group Intervention for Adults in a Primary Mental Health Service. (2026) · cites this paper as Craig et al. 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2013) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · Cited by 116,369
Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.52.6.377 · Cited by 8,252
The Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Self-Compassion
NEFF, K. D. (2003) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298860309027 · Cited by 6,436
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance
Moore, G. F., Audrey, S., Barker, M., Bond, L., Bonell, C., Hardeman, W., Moore, L., O'Cathain, A., Tinati, T., Wight, D., et al. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.h1258 · Cited by 6,204 · cited 2×
“The Medical Research Council’s guidelines [13] for evaluating complex interventions suggest using both quantitative and qualitative measures of acceptability and satisfaction, including how patients are interacting with the intervention (such as engaging in therapeutic tasks).”
BackgroundThe Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses
Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J. J., Sawyer, A. T., & Fang, A. (2012) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-012-9476-1 · Cited by 3,445 · cited 2×
“As CBT is the current treatment of choice for most psychological ailments due to its sizeable evidence-base [54] it is important that CFT is directly compared with CBT in terms of its effects.”
BackgroundPorges, S. W. (2007) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.06.009 · Cited by 3,415
Exploring compassion: A meta-analysis of the association between self-compassion and psychopathology
MacBeth, A., & Gumley, A. (2012) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.06.003 · Cited by 1,838 · cited 3×
“A meta-analysis found that greater self-compassion is associated with fewer mental health difficulties, yet lower self-compassion is associated with increased psychopathology [10].”
BackgroundInfluentialGilbert, P., & Procter, S. (2006) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.507 · Cited by 1,822 · cited 3×
“Those with the lowest number of completers were populations with severe and complex mental health problems: Heriot-Maitland et al. [34] found that only 66% of patients on a psychiatric ward remained for the majority of one session, and Gilbert and Proctor [47] found only 67% of patients attending a day center (with lo…”
BackgroundResultSelf-compassion and adaptive psychological functioning.
Neff, K. D., Kirkpatrick, K. L., & Rude, S. S. (2007) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.03.004 · Cited by 1,627
The origins and nature of compassion focused therapy
Gilbert, P. (2014) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjc.12043 · Cited by 1,593
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- LeDoux J, 1998, The emotional brain
- Carlyle M, 2019, J Subst Abuse Treat, 13, 1
- Noorbala F, 2013, Iran J Psychiatry, 8, 113
- Beaumont E, 2012, Couns Psychol Rev, 27, 31
- World Health Organization, 2016, ICD-11 Beta Draft (Joint Linearization for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics)
- Bargh J, 2017, Before you know it: the unconscious reasons we do what we do
- Anstiss T, 2017, The wiley blackwell handbook of the psychology of positivity and strengths‐based approaches at work
- West M, 2017, Caring to change: how compassionate leadership can stimulate innovation in health care
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Self-compassion: Theory, method, research, and intervention
Neff, K. D. (2023) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-031047 · Cited by 931
“CFT has extensive empirical support for its efficacy (see Craig et al. 2020 and Kirby 2017 for reviews).”
BackgroundCompassion: From Its Evolution to a Psychotherapy
Gilbert, P. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586161 · Cited by 365
Wakelin, K. E., Perman, G., & Simonds, L. M. (2022) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2586 · Cited by 170
“Second, samples with and without diagnosed mental health difficulties were included, unlike the recent meta-analys es that only considered participants with classifiable mental health symptoms (Craig et al., 2020; Wilson et al., 2019).”
MethodMillard, L. A., Wan, M. W., Smith, D. M., & Wittkowski, A. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.01.010 · Cited by 156
Qu, D., Liu, B., Jia, L., Zhang, X., Chen, D., Zhang, Q., Feng, Y., & Chen, R. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.108059 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Craig, C., Hiskey, S., & Spector, A.
- Affiliations
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Oaks Hospital (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Craig, Catriona
- Venue
- Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-04-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 385-400
- ISSN
- 1473-7175 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-8360
- OpenAlex
- W3011072785
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- discovery.ucl.ac.uk
- Locations
- Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- compassion-focused therapy, treatment effectiveness, acceptability, transdiagnostic treatment, group therapy, mental illness, evidence-based practice, healthcare resource allocation
- MeSH terms
- Empathy, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Psychotherapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
