Cited by 58Gender, Sexuality, and EducationBullying, Victimization, and AggressionLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

Rethinking safe schools approaches for LGBTQ students: changing the questions we ask

Payne, Elizabethe, Smith, Melissa·2012·Multicultural Perspectives

Abstract

In this article the authors address the limitations of framing “the problem” of in-school LGBTQ harassment within dominant anti-bullying discourses. They offer a critical sociological framework as an alternative way of understanding the issues of LGBTQ harassment and propose a research agenda in which school culture and gender policing are the objects of inquiry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15210960.2012.725293

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Payne, E., & Smith, M.
Venue
Multicultural Perspectives
Published
2012-11
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
187-193
ISSN
  • 1521-0960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7892
OpenAlex
W2062433431
Cited by
58
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Multicultural Perspectives (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Keywords
LGBTQ students, school harassment, school safety, school culture, gender policing, critical sociology, research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review