The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PHYTOREMEDIATION OF INORGANICS: REALISM AND SYNERGIES
Abstract
There are very few practical demonstrations of the phytoextraction of metals and metalloids from soils and sediments beyond small-scale and short-term trials. The two approaches used have been based on using 1) hyperaccumulator species, such as Thlaspi caerulescens (Pb, Zn, Cd, Ni), Alyssum spp. (Ni, Co), and Pteris vittata (As) or 2) fast-growing plants, such as Salix and Populus spp. that accumulate above-average concentrations of only a smaller number of the more mobile trace elements (Cd, Zn, B). Until we have advanced much more along the pathway of genetic isolation and transfer of hyperaccumulator traits into productive plants, there is a high risk in marketing either approach as a technology or stand-alone solution to clean up contaminated land. There are particular uncertainties over the longer-term effectiveness of phytoextraction and associated environmental issues. Marginally contaminated agricultural soils provide the most likely land use where phytoextraction can be used as a polishing technology. An alternative and more useful practical approach in many situations currently would be to give more attention to crops selected for phytoexclusion: selecting crops that do not translocate high concentrations of metals to edible parts. Soils of brownfield, urban, and industrial areas provide a large-scale opportunity to use phytoremediation, but the focus here should be on the more realistic possibilities of risk-managed phytostabilization and monitored natural attenuation. We argue that the wider practical applications of phytoremediation are too often overlooked. There is huge scope for cross-cutting other environmental agenda, with synergies that involve the recovery and provision of services from degraded landscapes and contaminated soils. An additional focus on biomass energy, improved biodiversity, watershed management, soil protection, carbon sequestration, and improved soil health is required for the justification and advancement of phytotechnologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stability of organic carbon in deep soil layers controlled by fresh carbon supply
Fontaine, S., Barot, S., Barré, P., Bdioui, N., Mary, B., & Rumpel, C. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06275 · Cited by 2,279
Accumulators and excluders ‐strategies in the response of plants to heavy metals
Baker, A. J. M. (1981) · Journal of Plant Nutrition · doi:10.1080/01904168109362867 · Cited by 2,233
Self-citationCarbon losses from all soils across England and Wales 1978–2003
Bellamy, P. H., Loveland, P. J., Bradley, R. I., Lark, R. M., & Kirk, G. J. D. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04038 · Cited by 1,131 · cited 1×
“Various forms of organic matter amendments, including composts and sludges, form an important component of many site remediations of contaminated land, which often contain younger soils without deep buried layers of organic carbon (Bellamy et al., 2005).”
BackgroundEvangelou, M. W. H., Ebel, M., & Schaeffer, A. (2007) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.01.062 · Cited by 632
Strategies of heavy metal uptake by three plant species growing near a metal smelter
Dahmani-Muller, H., van Oort, F., Gélie, B., & Balabane, M. (2000) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/s0269-7491(99)00262-6 · Cited by 493
Lebeau, T., Braud, A., & Jézéquel, K. (2008) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.09.015 · Cited by 383
Bio-accumulation and distribution of heavy metals in fibre crops (flax, cotton and hemp)
Angelova, V., Ivanova, R., Delibaltova, V., & Ivanov, K. (2004) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2003.10.001 · Cited by 307
do Nascimento, C. W. A., Amarasiriwardena, D., & Xing, B. (2006) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2005.06.017 · Cited by 280
Bañuelos, G., Terry, N., LeDuc, D. L., Pilon-Smits, E. A. H., & Mackey, B. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es049035f · Cited by 226
Vysloužilová, M., Tlustoš, P., & Száková, J. (2003) · Plant Soil and Environment · doi:10.17221/4191-pse · Cited by 138
Cited by
Aquatic arsenic: Toxicity, speciation, transformations, and remediation
Sharma, V. K., & Sohn, M. (2009) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2009.01.005 · Cited by 1,119
Metal tolerance and hyperaccumulation: Costs and trade-offs between traits and environment
Maestri, E., Marmiroli, M., Visioli, G., & Marmiroli, N. (2010) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.10.011 · Cited by 538
Mench, M., Lepp, N., Bert, V., Schwitzguébel, J.-P., Gawronski, S. W., Schröder, P., & Vangronsveld, J. (2010) · Journal of Soils and Sediments · doi:10.1007/s11368-010-0190-x · Cited by 413
Trace element behaviour at the root–soil interface: Implications in phytoremediation
Kidd, P., Barceló, J., Bernal, M. P., Navari-Izzo, F., Poschenrieder, C., Shilev, S., Clemente, R., & Monterroso, C. (2009) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.06.013 · Cited by 395
Marmiroli, M., Pietrini, F., Maestri, E., Zacchini, M., Marmiroli, N., & Massacci, A. (2011) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/tpr090 · Cited by 186
Metadata
- Authors
- Dickinson, N. M., Baker, A. J. M., Doronila, A., Laidlaw, S., & Reeves, R. D.
- Venue
- International Journal of Phytoremediation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 97-114
- ISSN
- 1522-6514 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7879
- OpenAlex
- W2080937197
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 12.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PHYTOREMEDIATION OF INORGANICS: REALISM AND SYNERGIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15226510802378368
- The paper
- Dickinson, N. M., Baker, A. J. M., Doronila, A., Laidlaw, S., & Reeves, R. D. (2009). PHYTOREMEDIATION OF INORGANICS: REALISM AND SYNERGIES. International Journal of Phytoremediation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226510802378368
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.