The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spatial, temporal, and socioeconomic patterns in the use of Twitter and Flickr
Abstract
Online social networking and information sharing services have generated large volumes of spatio-temporal footprints, which are potentially a valuable source of knowledge about the physical environment and social phenomena. However, it is critical to take into consideration the uneven distribution of the data generated in social media in order to understand the nature of such data and to use them appropriately. The distribution of footprints and the characteristics of contributors indicate the quantity, quality, and type of the data. Using georeferenced tweets and photos collected from Twitter and Flickr, this research presents the spatial and temporal patterns of such crowd-sourced geographic data in the contiguous United States and explores the socioeconomic characteristics of geographic data creators by investigating the relationships between tweet and photo densities and the characteristics of local people using California as a case study. Correlations between dependent and independent variables in partial least squares regression suggest that well-educated people in the occupations of management, business, science, and arts are more likely to be involved in the generation of georeferenced tweets and photos. Further research is required to explain why some people tend to produce and spread information over the Internet using social media from the perspectives of psychology and sociology. This study would be informative to sociologists who study the behaviors of social media users, geographers who are interested in the spatial and temporal distribution of social media users, marketing agencies who intend to understand the influence of social media, and other scientists who use social media data in their research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
Silverman, B. W. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315140919 · Cited by 15,796
PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics
Wold, S., Sjöström, M., & Eriksson, L. (2001) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7439(01)00155-1 · Cited by 10,084
Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
(1986) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3324-9 · Cited by 8,525
Twitter mood predicts the stock market
Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011) · Journal of Computational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2010.12.007 · Cited by 5,206
Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals
Robinson, W. S. (1950) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2087176 · Cited by 4,513
Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors
Sakaki, T., Okazaki, M., & Matsuo, Y. (2010) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772777 · Cited by 3,640
Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment
Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T., Sandner, P., & Welpe, I. (2010) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14009 · Cited by 2,649
Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities
Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. (2007) · Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis · doi:10.1145/1348549.1348556 · Cited by 2,645
Interactive Spatial Data Analysis
Bailey, T., & Gatrell, A. C. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,945
Haklay, M. (2010) · Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design · doi:10.1068/b35097 · Cited by 1,632
Cited by
Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries
Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Kiciman, E. (2016) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2886526 · Cited by 763
Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries
Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Kıcıman, E. (2019) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2019.00013 · Cited by 763
Passive crowdsourcing of social media in environmental research: A systematic map
Ghermandi, A., & Sinclair, M. (2019) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.02.003 · Cited by 363
Social-media data for urban sustainability
Ilieva, R. T., & McPhearson, T. (2018) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0153-6 · Cited by 291
Tenerelli, P., Demšar, U., & Luque, S. (2016) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.12.042 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, L., Goodchild, M. F., & Xu, B.
- Venue
- Cartography and Geographic Information Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 61-77
- ISSN
- 1523-0406 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-0465
- OpenAlex
- W2042831537
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 196.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial, temporal, and socioeconomic patterns in the use of Twitter and Flickr. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15230406.2013.777139
- The paper
- Li, L., Goodchild, M. F., & Xu, B. (2013). Spatial, temporal, and socioeconomic patterns in the use of Twitter and Flickr. Cartography and Geographic Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2013.777139
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.