Cited by 132Reading and Literacy DevelopmentMultilingual Education and PolicySecond Language Acquisition and Learning

The Interdependence Continuum: A Perspective on the Nature of Spanish–English Bilingual Reading Comprehension

Proctor, C. Patrick, August, Diane, Snow, Catherine, Barr, Christopher D.·2010·Bilingual Research Journal

Abstract

The purpose of the current study is to elaborate on the statistical nature of the linguistic interdependence hypothesis (CitationCummins, 1979). It is argued that reading skills across the languages of bilingual learners are differentially robust to interdependence, falling along a continuum mediated by the commonalities between Spanish and English. Reading data were collected from a sample of 91 Spanish–English bilingual fourth-grade students, and structural equation modeling was used to test a path model of the interdependence continuum. The model assumed that Spanish–English interdependence would be strong for alphabetic knowledge, moderate for reading comprehension, and mild for the link between Spanish oral language and English reading comprehension. The model fit the data well, providing some initial evidence for an interdependence continuum that varies as a function of language typology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15235881003733209

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study does not confirm the hypothesis advanced by Verhoeven (1994) and Proctor et al. (2010) that SES-context would play a role in linguistic interdependence, at least not in relation to receptive vocabulary in emergent bilingual children.

    “Hence, our study does not confirm the hypothesis advanced by Verhoeven (1994) and Proctor et al. (2010), amongst others, that SES-context would play a role in linguistic interdependence - at least not in relation to receptive vocabulary in emergent bilingual children.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Proctor, C. P., August, D., Snow, C., & Barr, C. D.
Affiliations
  • Boston College (US)
  • Center for Applied Linguistics (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Proctor, C. Patrick
Venue
Bilingual Research Journal
Published
2010-04-29
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
5-20
ISSN
  • 1523-5882 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-5890
OpenAlex
W2005117275
Cited by
132
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Bilingual Research Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
Flinders University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
linguistic interdependence hypothesis, Spanish-English bilingualism, reading comprehension, alphabetic knowledge, linguistic typology, bilingual reading, fourth grade

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review