Cited by 175Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Dissociative Symptoms and Trauma Exposure: Specificity, Affect Dysregulation, and Posttraumatic Stress

Briere, John·2006·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

Although dissociation is often described as a posttraumatic response, the actual statistical association between trauma exposure and dissociative symptoms is surprisingly small. This suggests that that some dissociative phenomena may be unrelated to trauma, or may be related in more complex ways. Analysis of the normative data for the Multiscale Dissociation Inventory revealed significant dissociative symptoms in only 8% of trauma-exposed individuals from the general population. However, 90% of those with at least one clinically significant dissociation scale on the Multiscale Dissociation Inventory reported a trauma history, and significant dissociation was found in only 2% of nontraumatized individuals. A history of interpersonal violence, number of different types of trauma exposure, posttraumatic stress, and affect dysregulation were univariate predictors of dissociative symptomatology in trauma-exposed participants, but only posttraumatic stress and affect dysregulation were multivariate predictors. Trauma is probably an important, but insufficient, condition for the development of dissociative symptomatology. Additional risk factors, such as high posttraumatic stress and/or reduced affect regulation capacities, may determine whether trauma exposure results in clinically significant dissociation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.nmd.0000198139.47371.54

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Briere, J.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Briere, John
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2006-02
Volume
194
Issue
2
Pages
78-82
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980859798
Cited by
175
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
dissociative symptoms, trauma exposure, post-traumatic stress, affect dysregulation, interpersonal violence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affective Symptoms, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Risk Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Violence, Comorbidity, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review