CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 401Spatial Cognition and NavigationVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesEducational Methods and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Spatial Visualization in Physics Problem Solving

Open access
Kozhevnikov, Maria, Motes, Michael A., Hegarty, Mary·2007·Cognitive Science
DOI 10.1080/15326900701399897
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Three studies were conducted to examine the relation of spatial visualization to solving kinematics problems that involved either predicting the two‐dimensional motion of an object, translating from one frame of reference to another, or interpreting kinematics graphs. In Study 1, 60 physics‐naíve students were administered kinematics problems and spatial visualization ability tests. In Study 2, 17 (8 high‐ and 9 low‐spatial ability) additional students completed think‐aloud protocols while they solved the kinematics problems. In Study 3, the eye movements of fifteen (9 high‐ and 6 low‐spatial ability) students were recorded while the students solved kinematics problems. In contrast to high‐spatial students, most low‐spatial students did not combine two motion vectors, were unable to switch frames of reference, and tended to interpret graphs literally. The results of the study suggest an important relationship between spatial visualization ability and solving kinematics problems with multiple spatial parameters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15326900701399897

Cites

37 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spatial cognition is known to underpin more advanced cognitive abilities.

    “Spatial cognition is known to underpin more advanced cognitive abilities (Kozhevnikov et al., 2007; Newcombe, 2010; Young et al., 2018).”

    From Does Spatial Cognition Emerge in Frontier Models? (2024) · cites this paper as Kozhevnikov et al., 2007

    The General Discussion says basic spatial-processing abilities might contribute to students’ conceptual understanding of physics, which supports a narrower version of the claim. It calls this relationship speculative and notes that the data are correlational; it does not establish that spatial cognition underpins advanced cognitive abilities generally. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Clement J., 1983, Mental models, 325
  2. 1991, Dictionary of Occupation Titles
  3. Ekstrom R. B., 1976, Manual for kit of factor referenced cognitive tests
  4. Ericsson K. A., 1991, Toward a general theory of expertise
  5. Hegarty M., 1999, Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design
  6. 10.1037/0096-1523.21.6.1391 · DOI
  7. Larkin J. H., 1982, Mental Models, 75
  8. 10.1037/0096-1523.19.6.1183 · DOI
  9. McCloskey M., 1983, Mental Models, 229
  10. Miller A. I., 1986, Imagery in Scientific Thought

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M. A., & Hegarty, M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
ORCID
Venue
Cognitive Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-07
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
549-579
ISSN
  • 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-6709
DOI
10.1080/15326900701399897
OpenAlex
W2112365876
Cited by
400
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 17
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Cognitive Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Office of Naval Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Outcomes
Keywords
spatial visualization, physics education, two-dimensional motion, reference frames, kinematic diagrams, think-aloud, eye movements, spatial ability, graph interpretation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review