The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Individual Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Child-Centered Therapy for Child Anxiety Disorders
Open accessAbstract
This study compared individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and a supportive child-centered therapy (CCT) for child anxiety disorders on rates of treatment response and recovery at posttreatment and 1-year follow-up, as well as on real-world measures of emotional functioning. Youth (N = 133; ages 9-14) with anxiety disorders (generalized, separation, and/or social anxiety) were randomized using a 2:1 ratio to CBT (n = 90) or CCT (n = 43), which served as an active comparison. Treatment response and recovery at posttreatment and 1-year follow-up were assessed by Independent Evaluators, and youth completed ecological momentary assessment of daily emotions throughout treatment. The majority of youth in both CBT and CCT were classified as treatment responders (71.1% for CBT, 55.8% for CCT), but youth treated with CBT were significantly more likely to fully recover, no longer meeting diagnostic criteria for any of the targeted anxiety disorders and no longer showing residual symptoms (66.7% for CBT vs. 46.5% for CCT). Youth treated with CBT also reported significantly lower negative emotions associated with recent negative events experienced in daily life during the latter stages of treatment relative to youth treated with CCT. Furthermore, a significantly higher percentage of youth treated with CBT compared to CCT were in recovery at 1-year follow-up (82.2% for CBT vs. 65.1% for CCT). These findings indicate potential benefits of CBT above and beyond supportive therapy on the breadth, generalizability, and durability of treatment-related gains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Meanwhile, Coping Cat reduced anxiety diagnoses (18% vs 35%) and symptoms on 1 measure (OR=3.29 and 2.56, respectively) in 1 trial.45”
From Six decades of preventing and treating childhood anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis to inform policy and practice (2019) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
KAUFMAN, J., BIRMAHER, B., BRENT, D., RAO, U., FLYNN, C., MORECI, P., WILLIAMSON, D., & RYAN, N. (1997) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-199707000-00021 · Cited by 10,148
Self-citationStatistical Analysis with Missing Data
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119013563 · Cited by 8,473
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence
Dumont, R., Willis, J. O., Veizel, K., & Zibulsky, J. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118660584.ese2519 · Cited by 5,546
BIRMAHER, B., KHETARPAL, S., BRENT, D., CULLY, M., BALACH, L., KAUFMAN, J., & NEER, S. M. (1997) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-199704000-00018 · Cited by 2,846
Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change
Sanford, E. F. (1988) · American Journal of Psychotherapy · doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1988.42.1.153 · Cited by 2,586
The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Handoll, H. H. (2004) · The British Journal of Hand Therapy · doi:10.1177/175899830400900201 · Cited by 1,515
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Sertraline, or a Combination in Childhood Anxiety
Walkup, J. T., Albano, A. M., Piacentini, J., Birmaher, B., Compton, S. N., Sherrill, J. T., Ginsburg, G. S., Rynn, M. A., McCracken, J., Waslick, B., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0804633 · Cited by 1,442
Self-citationMidwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women
Sandall, J., Soltani, H., Gates, S., Shennan, A. H., & Devane, D. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004667.pub3 · Cited by 1,264
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(2018) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781506326139.n198 · Cited by 1,244
Adolescents' Emotion Regulation in Daily Life: Links to Depressive Symptoms and Problem Behavior
Silk, J. S., Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2003) · Child Development · doi:10.1046/j.1467-8624.2003.00643.x · Cited by 1,216
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents
James, A. C., James, G., Cowdrey, F. A., Soler, A., & Choke, A. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004690.pub4 · Cited by 876
Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents
James, A. C., Reardon, T., Soler, A., James, G., & Creswell, C. (2020) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013162.pub2 · Cited by 344
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
(2013) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/10567.1573-2827 · Cited by 268
van Os, J., Verhagen, S., Marsman, A., Peeters, F., Bak, M., Marcelis, M., Drukker, M., Reininghaus, U., Jacobs, N., Lataster, T., et al. (2017) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.22647 · Cited by 230
Whiteside, S. P. H., Sim, L. A., Morrow, A. S., Farah, W. H., Hilliker, D. R., Murad, M. H., & Wang, Z. (2020) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10567-019-00303-2 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Silk, J. S., Tan, P. Z., Ladouceur, C. D., Meller, S., Siegle, G. J., McMakin, D. L., Forbes, E. E., Dahl, R. E., Kendall, P. C., Mannarino, A., & Ryan, N. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Temple University (US)
- Drexel University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Silk, Jennifer S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-03-16
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 542-554
- ISSN
- 1537-4416 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-4424
- PMC
- PMC5218980
- OpenAlex
- W2330206646
- Semantic Scholar
- 43b76ff8c495dbcf7a5094fd9b2ada96332fdacb
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 16.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (P50 MH080215)
- University of Pittsburgh (RR024153)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
- Keywords
- childhood anxiety disorders, cognitive behavioral therapy, child-centered therapy, supportive therapy, generalized anxiety disorder, separation anxiety, social anxiety, treatment response, recovery, long-term follow-up, ecological momentary assessment, daily emotions
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
