Cited by 191Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

A Meta-analysis to Guide the Enhancement of CBT for Childhood Anxiety: Exposure Over Anxiety Management

Open access
Whiteside, Stephen P. H., Sim, Leslie A., Morrow, Allison S., Farah, Wigdan H., Hilliker, Daniel R., Murad, M. Hassan, Wang, Zhen·2020·Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

Abstract

Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is the most empirically supported therapy for childhood anxiety disorders (CADs) but has not reliably outperformed other credible interventions. The current study used meta-analysis to examine the frequency with which the most common treatment components are included in outcome studies and the relation of these components to symptom improvement. Seventy-five studies were identified that included youth with an anxiety disorder treated with CBT or a comparison condition. The protocols for the 111 CBT conditions generally consisted of 12, 1-h sessions delivered to the child with minimal parent inclusion. A greater amount of in-session exposure was related to significantly larger effect sizes between CBT and waitlist control across reporters (- 0.12 to - 0.15; P's < .05) and from pre- to post-treatment for child report (- .06; P < .01). Compared to treatments that omitted relaxation, treatments that included relaxation strategies were associated with significantly smaller pre- to post-treatment effect sizes across reporters (0.38 to 0.80; P's < .05). The current study suggests that CBT protocols for CADs that emphasize in-session exposure and do not include relaxation have the potential to improve the efficacy and effectiveness of therapy. Dismantling studies directly testing these hypotheses are needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10567-019-00303-2

Cites

126 of 126 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CBT based on exposure principles demonstrates high to moderate effects across anxiety disorders in meta-analyses, even against placebo conditions.

    “and demonstrates high to moderate effects across disorders in meta-analyses, even against placebo conditions (e.g., Carpenter et al., 2018;Whiteside et al., 2020).”

    From Effective—and Tolerable: Acceptance and Side Effects of Intensified Exposure for Anxiety Disorders (2023) · cites this paper as Whiteside et al., 2020

    The Abstract and Treatment Outcome section report a meta-analysis of CBT for childhood anxiety in which more in-session exposure was associated with larger effects relative to waitlist controls. The paper does not establish high-to-moderate effects across anxiety disorders generally: it studies children, does not characterize the overall effects that way, and its Data Synthesis and Analyses section says it did not examine between-group effects against active controls. It therefore does not support the placebo-comparison portion of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The inclusion of somatic coping strategies in pediatric CBT for anxiety has been questioned.

    “But the inclusion of such somatic coping strategies in pediatric CBT for anxiety has been questioned [26, 50].”
  • A meta-analysis showed that interventions incorporating somatic management strategies (including relaxation and breathing exercises) had smaller effect sizes than those that omitted such strategies.

    “A meta-analysis showed that interventions incorporating somatic management strategies (including relaxation and breathing exercises) had smaller effect sizes than those that omitted such strategies [50].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 127 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Abbasi Z, Amiri S, Talebi, &amp; H. (2016). The effective comparison between modular cognitive behavioral therapy (MCBT) and child-parent relationship training (CPRT) in children with separation anxiety symptoms. Social Sciences (Pakistan), 11(6), 890-902. doi:10.3923/ sscience.2016.890.902
  2. Olivares-Rodriguez J, Rosa-Alcazar AI, &amp; Olivares-Olivares PJ (2006). The relevance of the individualized attention in the treatment with adolescents under generalized social phobia. International journal of clinical and health psychology, 6(3), 565-580.
  3. Rodriguez J, O., Alcazar A, Rodriguez I, &amp; J A. (2005). Early detection and treatment of adolescents with generalized social phobia. Psicothema, 17(1), 1-8.
  4. Rosa A, Ana I, Olivares O, Pablo J, Olivares, &amp; Jose. (2009). The role of non-specific effects in the psychological treatment of adolescents with social phobia. Anuario de Psicologia, 40(1), 43-61.
  5. Rosa A, Ana I, Olivares R, Jose, Olivares O, &amp; Pablo. (2007). The role of planned interaction in the treatment of generalized social phobia. Terapia Psicologica, 25(2), 205-212.
  6. Rosa-Alcazar A, Boix I, Amoros M, Olivares-Olivares P, &amp; J. (2013). Contributions of cognitive restructuring in the treatment of social phobia in adolescents. Behavioral Psychology / Psicologia Conductual: Revista Internacional Clinica y de la Salud Psicologia Conductual Revista Internacional de Psicologia Clinica de la Salud, 21(1), 6-23.
  7. Beidel DC, Turner SM, Sallee FR, Ammerman RT, Crosby LA, &amp; Pathak S (2007). SET-C versus fluoxetine in the treatment of childhood social phobia. Journal of the American Academy of Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry, 46(12), 1622-1632. doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e318154bb57 [PubMed: 18030084] · DOI · Paper page
  8. Ginsburg GS, Becker KD, Drazdowski TK, &amp; Tein JY (2012). Treating Anxiety Disorders in Inner City Schools: Results from a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing CBT and Usual Care. Child Youth Care Forum, 41(1), 1-19. doi:10.1007/s10566-011-9156-4 [PubMed: 22701295] · DOI
  9. Hirshfeld-Becker DR, Masek B, Henin A, Blakely LR, Pollock-Wurman RA, McQuade J, . . . Biederman J (2010). Cognitive behavioral therapy for 4- to 7-year-old children with anxiety disorders: a randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol, 78(4), 498-510. doi:10.1037/ a0019055 [PubMed: 20658807]
  10. Kendall PC (1994). Treating anxiety disorders in children: results of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(1), 100-110. [PubMed: 8034812]
  11. Khanna MS, &amp; Kendall PC (2010). Computer-assisted cognitive behavioral therapy for child anxiety: results of a randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol, 78(5), 737-745. doi:201019874-014 [pii] [PubMed: 20873909]
  12. PCORI. (2018). PCORI Funding Announcement: Pharmacological Treatment of Anxiety Disorders in Children, Adolescents and/or Young Adults [Press release]. Retrieved from https:// www.pcori.org/sites/default/files/PCORI-PFA-2018-Cycle-1-Pediatric-Anxiety.pdf
  13. Walkup JT, Albano AM, Piacentini JC, Birmaher B, Compton SN, Sherrill JT, . . . Kendall PC. (2008). Cognitive behavioral therapy, sertraline, or a combination in childhood anxiety. The New England Journal of Medicine, 359, 2753-2766. [PubMed: 18974308]
  14. Whiteside SPH, Ale CM, Young B, Dammann J, Tiede MS, &amp; Biggs BK (2015). The feasibility of improving CBT for childhood anxiety disorders through a dismantling study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 73, 83-89. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2015.07.011 [PubMed: 26275761] · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whiteside, S. P. H., Sim, L. A., Morrow, A. S., Farah, W. H., Hilliker, D. R., Murad, M. H., & Wang, Z.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Whiteside, Stephen P. H.
Venue
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
Published
2019-10-18
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
102-121
ISSN
  • 1096-4037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2827
OpenAlex
W2980786259
Cited by
190
References
127
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HHSA290201500013I)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, childhood anxiety disorders, relaxation techniques, treatment components, treatment efficacy, waitlist control, child-reported outcomes, parental involvement
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Child, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Relaxation Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review