The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluating Strategies Used To Incorporate Technology Into Preservice Education: A Review Of the Literature
Abstract
The following paper is based on a review of 68 refereed journal articles that focused on introducing technology to preservice teachers. Ten key strategies emerged from this review, including delivering a single technology course; offering mini-workshops; integrating technology in all courses; modeling how to use technology; using multimedia; collaboration among preservice teachers, mentor teachers and faculty; practicing technology in the field; focusing on education faculty; focusing on mentor teachers; and improving access to software, hardware, and/or support. These strategies were evaluated based on their effect on computer attitude, ability, and use. The following patterns emerged: First, most studies looked at programs that incorporated only one to three strategies. Second, when four or more strategies were used, the effect on preservice teacher’s use of computers appeared to be more pervasive. Third, most research examined attitudes, ability, or use, but rarely all three. Fourth, and perhaps most important, the vast majority of studies had severe limitations in method: poor data collection instruments, vague sample and program descriptions, small samples, an absence of statistical analysis, or weak anecdotal descriptions of success. It is concluded that more rigorous and comprehensive research is needed to fully understand and evaluate the effect of key technology strategies in preservice teacher education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sang, G., Valcke, M., Braak, J. V., & Tondeur, J. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010 · Cited by 840
Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: implications for teacher education
Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085 · Cited by 599
Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Baran, E., Siddiq, F., Valtonen, T., & Sointu, E. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12748 · Cited by 341
Kabakci Yurdakul, I., Odabasi, H. F., Kilicer, K., Coklar, A. N., Birinci, G., & Kurt, A. A. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.012 · Cited by 323
The practicum in preservice teacher education: a review of empirical studies
Cohen, E., Hoz, R., & Kaplan, H. (2013) · Teaching Education · doi:10.1080/10476210.2012.711815 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Kay, R. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Research on Technology in Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 383-408
- ISSN
- 1539-1523 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-0818
- OpenAlex
- W2052215499
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 52.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating Strategies Used To Incorporate Technology Into Preservice Education: A Review Of the Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15391523.2006.10782466
- The paper
- Kay, R. H. (2006). Evaluating Strategies Used To Incorporate Technology Into Preservice Education: A Review Of the Literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2006.10782466
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.