The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Teacher educators as gatekeepers: Preparing the next generation of teachers for technology integration in education
Abstract
This study aims at investigating the profiles of teacher educators in order to explore their ability to prepare preservice teachers for technology integration in education. Specifically, the current study examines whether teacher educators can be grouped on the basis of their attitudes toward ICT (in education), their ICT self‐efficacy to design ICT‐rich learning environments, their competencies to use ICT in their teaching practice and the strategies they use to prepare preservice teachers for technology integration. These strategies are included in the SQD (Synthesis of Qualitative Data) model and comprise: (1) teacher educators as role models, (2) reflecting on the role of technology in education, (3) learning how to use technology by design, (4) collaboration with peers, (5) scaffolding authentic technology experiences and (6) providing continuous feedback. Data were collected from a sample of 284 teacher educators in Flanders, the Dutch‐speaking part of Belgium, and submitted to latent profile analysis. The added value of the current study lies in the account of how SQD strategies and a typical set of determinants of ICT integration can be associated within teacher educators’ profile. Based on the profiles emerging from this study, teacher training institutions should consider their teacher educators to be gatekeepers when preparing future generations of teachers for the learning environments of the twenty‐first century. In the discussion section, the implications for practice and future research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2769 · Cited by 15,614
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x · Cited by 12,604
(2010) · Cited by 7,034
Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249688 · Cited by 6,553
Testing the number of components in a normal mixture
Lo, Y. (2001) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/88.3.767 · Cited by 4,640
Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164413495237 · Cited by 3,931
What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013) · Journal of Education · doi:10.1177/002205741319300303 · Cited by 2,790
Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2010) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y · Cited by 2,695
Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration?
Ertmer, P. A. (2005) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02504683 · Cited by 2,408
Handbook of research on science teaching and learning
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-4019 · Cited by 2,062
Cited by
Artificial intelligence and learning analytics in teacher education: A systematic review
Salas-Pilco, S., Xiao, K., & Hu, X. (2022) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12080569 · Cited by 326
Lampropoulos, G., Keramopoulos, E., Diamantaras, K., & Evangelidis, G. (2022) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12110798 · Cited by 119
The HeDiCom framework: higher education teachers' digital competencies for the future
Tondeur, J., Howard, S., Van Zanten, M., Gorissen, P., Van der Neut, I., Uerz, D., & Kral, M. (2023) · Educational technology research and development · doi:10.1007/s11423-023-10193-5 · Cited by 115
Self-citationEnhancing artificial intelligence literacy through cross-cultural online workshops
Korte, S.-M., Cheung, W. M.-Y., Maasilta, M., Kong, S.-C., Keskitalo, P., Wang, L., Lau, C. M., Lee, J. C. K., & Gu, M. M. (2024) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100164 · Cited by 49
Language teachers’ beliefs about using high-immersion virtual reality
Kaplan-Rakowski, R., Dhimolea, T. K., & Khukalenko, I. S. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11686-9 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Baran, E., Siddiq, F., Valtonen, T., & Sointu, E.
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-03-08
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1189-1209
- ISSN
- 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8535
- OpenAlex
- W2921079783
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 80.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Teacher educators as gatekeepers: Preparing the next generation of teachers for technology integration in education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/bjet.12748
- The paper
- Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Baran, E., Siddiq, F., Valtonen, T., & Sointu, E. (2019). Teacher educators as gatekeepers: Preparing the next generation of teachers for technology integration in education. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12748
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.