Cited by 16Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsHealth Policy Implementation SciencePsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Information without Implementation: A Practical Example for Developing a Best Practice Education Control Group

Open access
Balderson, Benjamin H., McCurry, Susan M., Vitiello, Michael V., Shortreed, Susan M., Rybarczyk, Bruce D., Keefe, Francis J., Korff, Michael Von·2016·Behavioral Sleep Medicine

Abstract

This article considers methodology for developing an education-only control group and proposes a simple approach to designing rigorous and well-accepted control groups. This approach is demonstrated in a large randomized trial. The Lifestyles trial (n = 367) compared three group interventions: (a) cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) for osteoarthritis pain, (b) CBT for osteoarthritis pain and insomnia, and (c) education-only control (EOC). EOC emulated the interventions excluding hypothesized treatment components and controlling for nonspecific treatment effects. Results showed this approach resulted in a control group that was highly credible and acceptable to patients. This approach can be an effective and practical guide for developing high-quality control groups in trials of behavioral interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15402002.2015.1036271

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An active control condition instead of treatment as usual was chosen to control for non-specific attention and self-monitoring effects.

    “An active control condition instead of treatment as usual was chosen to control for non-specific attention and self-monitoring effects [27].”

    From Online prenatal trial in mindfulness sleep management (OPTIMISM): Protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial (2020) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Introduction and Discussion explain that care-as-usual controls often fail to account for nonspecific effects, and Methods > Intervention Development says the education-only control accounted for therapist attention. But that section says control participants kept no weekly behavioral logs, so it does not support the claim that the active control accounted for self-monitoring effects. Our copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Participants will know that the research study is testing two alternative online interventions to improve sleep in pregnancy but will not be informed of the nature of the two interventions. This reduces the likelihood of EOC participants seeking out mindfulness treatments independently, or dropping prematurely because of disappointment over being assigned to a control group.

    “Participants will know that the research study is testing two alternative online interventions to improve sleep in pregnancy but will not be informed of the nature of the two interventions. This reduces the likelihood of EOC participants seeking out mindfulness treatments independently, or dropping prematurely because of disappointment over being assigned to a control group [27].”

    From Online prenatal trial in mindfulness sleep management (OPTIMISM): Protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial (2020) · cites this paper as [27]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Strengths of this study include provision of an active control treatment based on sleep education tailored to pregnancy.

    “Strengths of this study include provision of an active control treatment based on sleep education [27] tailored to pregnancy.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lorig K Fries JF The Arthritis Helpbook 1995 Addison-Wesley Publishing Company New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Balderson, B. H., McCurry, S. M., Vitiello, M. V., Shortreed, S. M., Rybarczyk, B. D., Keefe, F. J., & Korff, M. V.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Balderson, Benjamin H.
Venue
Behavioral Sleep Medicine
Published
2015-10-20
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
514-527
ISSN
  • 1540-2002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-2010
OpenAlex
W1794328166
Cited by
16
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioral Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01-AG031126)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
control group design, randomized controlled trials, behavioral interventions, cognitive behavioral therapy, osteoarthritis pain, insomnia
MeSH terms
Aged, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Control Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review