Cited by 17Sleep and related disordersCancer survivorship and careSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Impacts of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia and pain on sleep in women with gynecologic malignancies: a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Padron, Adaixa, McCrae, Christina S., Robinson, Michael E., Waxenberg, Lori B., Antoni, Michael H., Berry, Richard B., Castagno, Jacqueline, Schultz, Gregory +8 more·2022·Behavioral Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Insomnia is an adverse cancer outcome impacting mood, pain, quality of life, and mortality in cancer patients. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is an evidence-based treatment for diverse psychophysiological disorders, including pain and insomnia. Primarily studied in breast cancer, there is limited research on CBT within gynecology oncology. This study examined CBT effects on subjective and behavioral sleep outcomes: Sleep Efficiency (SE), Sleep Quality (SQ), Total Wake Time (TWT), Sleep Onset Latency (SOL), and Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO). Thirty-five women with insomnia status/post-surgery for gynecologic cancer were randomized to CBT for insomnia and pain (CBTi.p., N = 18) or Psychoeducation (N = 17). Sleep was assessed via sleep diaries and wrist-worn actigraphy at baseline (T1), post-intervention (T2), and two-month follow-up (T3). Intent-to-treat analyses utilizing mixed linear modeling examined longitudinal group differences on sleep controlling for age and advanced cancer. All participants demonstrated improved (1) subjective SE (0.5, p < .01), SOL (−1.2, p < .01), TWT (−1.2, p < .01), and (2) behavioral SE (0.1, p = .02), TWT (−1.2, p = .03), WASO (−0.8, p < .01) across time. Group-level time trends were indicative of higher subjective SE (6.8, p = .02), lower TWT (−40.3, p = .01), and lower SOL (−13.0, p = .05) in CBTi.p. compared to Psychoeducation. Supplemental analyses examining clinical significance and acute treatment effects demonstrated clinical improvements in SE (T1), TWT (T2, T3), and SOL (T3). Remaining effects were not significant. Despite lacking power to detect interaction effects, CBTi.p. clinically improved sleep in women with gynecologic cancers and insomnia during the active treatment phase. Future research will focus on developing larger trials within underserved populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15402002.2021.1932500

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The less convincing effects of CBT-I on sleep quality could be due to negative or smaller effects in studies assessing sleep quality without focusing on insomnia severity, including studies with active controls or studies not using insomnia as an inclusion criterion.

    “This result could be due to negative or smaller effects in studies assessing sleep quality without focusing on insomnia severity, including studies with active controls (50, 58) or studies not using insomnia as an inclusion criterion (85).”

    From Interventions for insomnia in cancer patients and survivors-a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [85]

    The cited study does not fit the description attached to citation 85. In Materials and Methods (Study participants; page unavailable), subjective sleep complaints were an inclusion criterion, and participants also had to meet specified sleep-diary thresholds before randomization. The Methods further state that patients screening positive for insomnia were invited to participate. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Padron, A., McCrae, C. S., Robinson, M. E., Waxenberg, L. B., Antoni, M. H., Berry, R. B., Castagno, J., Schultz, G., Kacel, E. L., Ulfig, C., Garey, S., Patidar, S., Sannes, T., Trinastic, L., Wong, S., & Pereira, D. B.
Affiliations
  • Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Pereira, Deidre B.
Venue
Behavioral Sleep Medicine
Published
2021-06-14
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
460-476
ISSN
  • 1540-2002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-2010
OpenAlex
W3171571982
Cited by
17
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioral Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
the National Institutes of Health (R01 CA138808)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, cancer pain, gynecologic cancer, insomnia, sleep efficiency, sleep quality, sleep latency, wake after sleep onset, psychoeducation, women, actigraphy, sleep diary
MeSH terms
Female, Genital Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Pain, Quality of Life, Sleep, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review