Cited by 144Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchPhysical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Activity Monitoring and Energy Expenditure in COPD Patients: A Validation Study

Open access
Patel, Sanjay A., Benzo, Roberto P., Slivka, William A., Sciurba, Frank C.·2007·COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the objective measurement of physical activity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients due to the close relationship between physical activity level, health, disability and mortality. We aimed to (a) determine the validity and reproducibility of an activity monitor that integrates accelerometry with multiple physiologic sensors in the determination of energy expenditure in COPD subjects and (b) to document the independent contribution of the additional physiologic sensors to accelerometry measures in improving true energy expenditure determination. Eight subjects (4 male, FEV(1) 56.4 +/- 14.1%, RV 145.0 +/- 75.7%) performed 2 separate 6-minute walk and 2 incremental shuttle walk exercise tests. Energy expenditure was calculated during each exercise test using the physiologic activity monitor and compared to a validated exhaled breath metabolic system. Test-retest reproducibility of physiologic activity monitor during the walking tests was comparable to an exhaled breath metabolic system. Physiologic sensor data significantly improved the explained variance in energy expenditure determination (r(2)=0.88) compared to accelerometry data alone (r(2)=0.68). This physiologic activity monitor provides a valid and reproducible estimate of energy expenditure during slow to moderate paced walking in a laboratory setting and represents an objective method to assess activity in COPD subjects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15412550701246658

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although not accurate at step counting, the multi-sensor system outperformed step counters in estimating energy expenditure at slow walking speeds.

    “Although not accurate at step counting, the multi-sensor system outperformed the step counters in estimating energy expenditure at slow walking speeds.”
  • Furlanetto et al and Patel et al showed that a multi-sensor system measuring galvanic skin response, heat flow and skin temperature in addition to motion provided accurate estimates of energy expenditure.

    “Furlanetto et al [116] and Patel et al. [117] showed that a multi-sensor system, which measured galvanic skin response, heat flow and skin temperature in addition to motion, provided accurate estimates of energy expenditure.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Jones PW, Quirk FH, Baveystock CM, Littlejohns P. A self- complete measure of health status for chronic airflow limita- tion. St. George's Respir Question Amer Rev Respir Dis 1992; 145(6):1321-1327.
  2. Patel SA, Sciurba FC. Validation of a weareable body monitoring device in COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004; 169:A771.
  3. Layton RP, Mints WH, Jr, Annis JF, Rack MJ, Webb P. Calorime- try with heat flux transducers: comparison with a suit calorime- ter. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exer Physiol 1983; 54(5):1361- 1367.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patel, S. A., Benzo, R. P., Slivka, W. A., & Sciurba, F. C.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Published
2007-01
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
107-112
ISSN
  • 1541-2555 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-2563
OpenAlex
W2090342579
Cited by
144
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 23
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • COPD Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000005)
  • National Cancer Institute (K23CA106544)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, energy expenditure, physical activity monitoring, accelerometry, wearable activity trackers, test-retest reproducibility, 6-minute walk test, objective activity measurement
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Aged, Energy Metabolism, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Male, Microcomputers, Microelectrodes, Middle Aged, Reproducibility of Results, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review