Cited by 360Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Comparison of Pedometer and Accelerometer Accuracy under Controlled Conditions

LE MASURIER, GUY C., TUDOR-LOCKE, CATRINE·2003·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was to compare the concurrent accuracy of the CSA accelerometer and the Yamax pedometer under two conditions: 1) on a treadmill at five different speeds and 2) riding in a motorized vehicle on paved roads. METHODS: In study 1, motion sensor performance was evaluated against actual steps taken during 5-min bouts at five different treadmill walking speeds (54, 67, 80, 94, and 107 m.min-1). In study 2, performance was evaluated during a roundtrip (drive 1 and drive 2) motor vehicle travel on paved roads (total distance traveled was 32.6 km or 20.4 miles). Any steps detected during motor vehicle travel were considered error. RESULTS: In study 1, the Yamax pedometer detected significantly (P < 0.05) fewer steps than actually taken at the slowest treadmill speed (54 m.min-1). Further, the pedometer detected fewer steps than the accelerometer at this speed (75.4% vs 98.9%, P < 0.05). There were no differences between instruments compared with actual steps taken at all other walking speeds. In study 2, the CSA detected approximately 17-fold more erroneous steps than the pedometer (approximately 250 vs 15 steps for the total distance traveled, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of the error (for either instrument) is not likely an important threat to the assessment of free-living ambulatory populations but may be a problem for pedometers when monitoring frail older adults with slow gaits. On the other hand, CSA accelerometers erroneously detect more nonsteps than the Yamax pedometer under typical motor vehicle traveling conditions. This threat to validity is likely only problematic when using the accelerometer to assess physical activity in sedentary individuals who travel extensively by motor vehicle.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/01.mss.0000064996.63632.10

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The proportion of the weekend weight increase attributable to higher dietary intake versus lower physical activity cannot be determined with certainty, because self-reported dietary intake accuracy varies between individuals and accelerometers may not detect small day-to-day differences in physical activity.

    “First, we cannot determine with certainty what proportion of the weekend weight increase was attributable to higher dietary intake or lower physical activity relative to weekdays, as the accuracy of self-reported dietary intake is variable between individuals (14-16), and the accelerometers may not be sensitive enough to detect small day-to-day differences in physical activity (17,18).”

    From Influence of Weekend Lifestyle Patterns on Body Weight (2008) · cites this paper as [18]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LE MASURIER, G. C., & TUDOR-LOCKE, C.
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2003-05
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
867-871
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012451507
Cited by
360
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 22
FWCI
7.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
pedometers, accelerometer, car travel, physical activity measurement, measurement error, frail elderly, sedentary individuals
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Adult, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Physical Fitness, Probability, Sampling Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Walking, Exercise Tolerance, Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review