The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lessons for Crisis Communication on Social Media: A Systematic Review of What Research Tells the Practice
Open accessAbstract
This study analyzes explicit pieces of advice for effective social media crisis communication given by researchers in various subdisciplines of strategic communication. The themes are identified by a systematic content analysis of peer-reviewed journal articles and conference papers (n = 104) published between 2004 and 2017. Five overall thematic “lessons” are identified and critically discussed. These are that effective social media crisis communication is about: (1) exploiting social media’s potential to create dialogue and to choose the right message, source and timing; (2) performing precrisis work and developing an understanding of the social media logic; (3) using social media monitoring; (4) continuing to prioritize traditional media in crisis situations; and finally, (5) just using social media in strategic crisis communication. These guidelines mainly emerged from quantitative research conducted in the context of the United Stated and on Twitter. There is need for more research focusing on other platforms and other empirical material. There is also a future need for an in-depth methodological discussion of how to further bridge the gap between research and practice on a global scale, and how to develop more evidence-based recommendations for strategic crisis communication practitioners.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1998) · Sage eBooks · Cited by 38,631
The Content Analysis Guidebook
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017) · doi:10.4135/9781071802878 · Cited by 9,286 · cited 1×
“In the third analytical phase, a quantitative descriptive content analysis (Neuendorf, 2002) was conducted of the research context characteristics of the studies building up each identified thematic lesson.”
MethodWhat Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World?
Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2007) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.21.2.153 · Cited by 2,668
Writing Narrative Literature Reviews
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311 · Cited by 1,482
Defining Strategic Communication
Hallahan, K., Holtzhausen, D., van Ruler, B., Verčič, D., & Sriramesh, K. (2007) · International Journal of Strategic Communication · doi:10.1080/15531180701285244 · Cited by 1,260
Kazdin, A. E. (2008) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.63.3.146 · Cited by 1,112
Best Practices in Crisis Communication: An Expert Panel Process
Seeger, M. W. (2006) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909880600769944 · Cited by 917
Houston, J. B., Hawthorne, J., Perreault, M. F., Park, E. H., Goldstein Hode, M., Halliwell, M. R., Turner McGowen, S. E., Davis, R., Vaid, S., McElderry, J. A., et al. (2015) · Disasters · doi:10.1111/disa.12092 · Cited by 869
Schultz, F., Utz, S., & Göritz, A. (2011) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.001 · Cited by 784
Doing your literature review: traditional and systematic techniques
Cronin, C. (2011) · Evaluation & Research in Education · doi:10.1080/09500790.2011.581509 · Cited by 753
Cited by
Exploring Corporate Reputation and Crisis Communication
Nuortimo, K., Harkonen, J., & Breznik, K. (2026) · Journal of Marketing Analytics · doi:10.1057/s41270-024-00353-8 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Eriksson, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Strategic Communication
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-08-30
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 526-551
- ISSN
- 1553-118X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-1198
- OpenAlex
- W2888858186
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 87
- FWCI
- 5.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lessons for Crisis Communication on Social Media: A Systematic Review of What Research Tells the Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1553118x.2018.1510405
- The paper
- Eriksson, M. (2018). Lessons for Crisis Communication on Social Media: A Systematic Review of What Research Tells the Practice. International Journal of Strategic Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2018.1510405
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.