Cited by 817

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bafilomycin A1 disrupts autophagic flux by inhibiting both V-ATPase-dependent acidification and Ca-P60A/SERCA-dependent autophagosome-lysosome fusion

Mauvezin, Caroline, Neufeld, Thomas P·2015·Autophagy

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15548627.2015.1066957

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Starvation-induced lipid droplets are prevented by inhibiting lysosomal acidification and degradative function with bafilomycin A1.

    “Previous work found that starvation-induced lipid droplets are prevented by inhibiting lysosomal acidification and degradative function with bafilomycin A1 12,34 .”
  • Blocking autophagic flux by Bafilomycin A1 increases tau and lysosomal lipid accumulation, while increased cholesterol and CE impairs autophagy function and tau degradation.

    “Blocking autophagic flux by Bafilomycin A1 increases tau and lysosomal lipid accumulation84, while increased cholesterol and CE impairs autophagy function and tau degradation18,27.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mauvezin, C., & Neufeld, T. P.
Venue
Autophagy
Published
2015-08-03
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
1437-1438
ISSN
  • 1554-8627
  • 1554-8635
Cited by
817
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review