The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Autophagy of cytoplasmic bulk cargo does not require LC3
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Some evidence, however, suggests that, at least in certain cell types, the LC3 subfamily may be dispensable for bulk autophagic sequestration of cytosolic proteins, whereas the GABARAP subfamily is absolutely required [33].”
From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [33]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Both starvation-induced autophagy and PINK1-PRKN-dependent mitophagy, as noted above, predominantly require the GABARAP subfamily over the LC3 subfamily [33,35,36].”
From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [33]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, commercial antibodies for GABARAPL1 also recognize GABARAP [33,195], which might lead to misinterpretation of experiments, in particular those using immunohistochemical techniques.”
From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [33]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“indeed, some variants of autophagy proceed in the absence of LC3-II [32][33][34][35][36].”
From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“Antibody specificity can be assessed after complete inhibition of GABARAP (or any other Atg8-family protein) expression by RNA interference [33,233].”
From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modulation of intracellular calcium homeostasis blocks autophagosome formation
Engedal, N., Torgersen, M. L., Guldvik, I. J., Barfeld, S. J., Bakula, D., Sætre, F., Hagen, L. K., Patterson, J. B., Proikas-Cezanne, T., Seglen, P. O., et al. (2013) · Autophagy · doi:10.4161/auto.25900 · Cited by 104
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 10.1146/annurev.ph.28.030166.002251 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.80.8.2179 · DOI
- 10.4161/auto.4377 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.111.3.941 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.12.021 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/febs.13268 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/dvdy.21392 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4161/auto.3910 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1242/jcs.126128 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1
Klionsky, D. J., Abdel-Aziz, A. K., Abdelfatah, S., Abdellatif, M., Abdoli, A., Abel, S., Abeliovich, H., Abildgaard, M. H., Abudu, Y. P., Acevedo-Arozena, A., et al. (2021) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280 · Cited by 2,897
Self-citationThe Autophagy Lysosomal Pathway and Neurodegeneration
Finkbeiner, S. (2020) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a033993 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Engedal, N., & Seglen, P. O.
- Affiliations
- Centre for Molecular Medicine Norway, Nordic EMBL Partnership, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Venue
- Autophagy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-01-26
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 439-441
- ISSN
- 1554-8627
- 1554-8635
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
