Cited by 391Autophagy in Disease and TherapyMuscle Physiology and DisordersMitochondrial Function and Pathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mitophagy is required for mitochondrial biogenesis and myogenic differentiation of C2C12 myoblasts

Open access

Abstract

Myogenesis is a crucial process governing skeletal muscle development and homeostasis. Differentiation of primitive myoblasts into mature myotubes requires a metabolic switch to support the increased energetic demand of contractile muscle. Skeletal myoblasts specifically shift from a highly glycolytic state to relying predominantly on oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) upon differentiation. We have found that this phenomenon requires dramatic remodeling of the mitochondrial network involving both mitochondrial clearance and biogenesis. During early myogenic differentiation, autophagy is robustly upregulated and this coincides with DNM1L/DRP1 (dynamin 1-like)-mediated fragmentation and subsequent removal of mitochondria via SQSTM1 (sequestosome 1)-mediated mitophagy. Mitochondria are then repopulated via PPARGC1A/PGC-1α (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha)-mediated biogenesis. Mitochondrial fusion protein OPA1 (optic atrophy 1 [autosomal dominant]) is then briskly upregulated, resulting in the reformation of mitochondrial networks. The final product is a myotube replete with new mitochondria. Respirometry reveals that the constituents of these newly established mitochondrial networks are better primed for OXPHOS and are more tightly coupled than those in myoblasts. Additionally, we have found that suppressing autophagy with various inhibitors during differentiation interferes with myogenic differentiation. Together these data highlight the integral role of autophagy and mitophagy in myogenic differentiation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15548627.2015.1115172

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Autophagy is upregulated during myogenic differentiation of C2C12 myoblasts. C2C12 skeletal myoblasts were differentiated for 6 d in low serum differentiation media. (A) Phase contrast microscopy of differentiating C2C12s in growth medium (GM) or 1 d, 3 d, or 6 d PD. Scale bars: 100 µm. (B) Western blot analysis of whole cell lysates from differentiating C2C12s. (C) Quantification of western blots in B normalized to ARHGDIA (**, P < 0.01; *****, P < 0.00001; Student t test; representative western blot is shown, n=3).
Figure 1. Autophagy is upregulated during myogenic differentiation of C2C12 myoblasts. C2C12 skeletal myoblasts were differentiated for 6 d in low serum differentiation media. (A) Phase contrast microscopy of differentiating C2C12s in growth medium (GM) or 1 d, 3 d, or 6 d PD. Scale bars: 100 µm. (B) Western blot analysis of whole cell lysates from differentiating C2C12s. (C) Quantification of western blots in B normalized to ARHGDIA (**, P < 0.01; *****, P < 0.00001; Student t test; representative western blot is shown, n=3).CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 2. Blocking autophagy prevents myogenic differentiation. C2C12 cells were pretreated with autophagy-inhibiting agents and were subsequently differentiated. (A, C, and E) Phase contrast microscopy of differentiating C2C12s pretreated with either siRNA targeting Atg5 (A), BAF (C), or siRNA targeting Sqstm1 prior to differentiation (E). Scale bars: 100 µm. (B, D, and F) Western blot analysis of whole cell lysates from siAtg5 (B), BAF (D), or siSqstm1 (F)-treated cells. GM, growth medium.
Figure 2. Blocking autophagy prevents myogenic differentiation. C2C12 cells were pretreated with autophagy-inhibiting agents and were subsequently differentiated. (A, C, and E) Phase contrast microscopy of differentiating C2C12s pretreated with either siRNA targeting Atg5 (A), BAF (C), or siRNA targeting Sqstm1 prior to differentiation (E). Scale bars: 100 µm. (B, D, and F) Western blot analysis of whole cell lysates from siAtg5 (B), BAF (D), or siSqstm1 (F)-treated cells. GM, growth medium.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 3. Mitochondrial remodeling occurs during myogenic differentiation. Differentiating C2C12s were examined for alterations in mitochondrial networks. (A) Cells expressing mitochondria-targeted DsRed were differentiated and examined with fluorescence microscopy. Exposure times were individually adjusted to bring out detail. Scale bars: 20 µm. (B) Differentiating cells immunostained for OPA1 (red) and imaged via fluorescence microscopy. All images were collected under identical illumination and exposure parameters. Scale bars: 20 µm. (C) Western blot analysis of whole cell lysates from differentiating C2C12s. (D) Quantification of western blots in C normalized to ARHGDIA (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; Student t test; representative western blot is shown, n=3). GM, growth medium.
Figure 3. Mitochondrial remodeling occurs during myogenic differentiation. Differentiating C2C12s were examined for alterations in mitochondrial networks. (A) Cells expressing mitochondria-targeted DsRed were differentiated and examined with fluorescence microscopy. Exposure times were individually adjusted to bring out detail. Scale bars: 20 µm. (B) Differentiating cells immunostained for OPA1 (red) and imaged via fluorescence microscopy. All images were collected under identical illumination and exposure parameters. Scale bars: 20 µm. (C) Western blot analysis of whole cell lysates from differentiating C2C12s. (D) Quantification of western blots in C normalized to ARHGDIA (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; Student t test; representative western blot is shown, n=3). GM, growth medium.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 4. Electron micrographs of differentiating C2C12s. Transmission electron microscopy was performed on differentiating C2C12s to examine alterations in mitochondrial populations. Insets are presented at higher magnification below each original image. Scale bars: 500 nm. GM, growth medium.
Figure 4. Electron micrographs of differentiating C2C12s. Transmission electron microscopy was performed on differentiating C2C12s to examine alterations in mitochondrial populations. Insets are presented at higher magnification below each original image. Scale bars: 500 nm. GM, growth medium.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 5. Mitochondrial remodeling is impaired when autophagic flux is blocked. BAF-treated cells were examined to determine if autophagic flux was required for mitochondrial remodeling. (A) C2C12s were pretreated with BAF or vehicle and then stained for TOMM70A (green) and with Hoechst 33342 (blue) and imaged via fluorescence microscopy. Insets are presented at higher magnification below each original image. Exposure times were individually adjusted to bring out detail. Scale bars: 20 µm. (B) Cells in A were analyzed using Image J to measure mitochondrial pixel area/perimeter ratios of individual cells as a measure of network interconnectivity. (***, P<.001; *****, P<.00001; Student t test, n=10) (C) Western blot analysis of whole cell lysates from BAF-treated C2C12s. (D) Quantification of western blots in C. GM, growth medium.
Figure 5. Mitochondrial remodeling is impaired when autophagic flux is blocked. BAF-treated cells were examined to determine if autophagic flux was required for mitochondrial remodeling. (A) C2C12s were pretreated with BAF or vehicle and then stained for TOMM70A (green) and with Hoechst 33342 (blue) and imaged via fluorescence microscopy. Insets are presented at higher magnification below each original image. Exposure times were individually adjusted to bring out detail. Scale bars: 20 µm. (B) Cells in A were analyzed using Image J to measure mitochondrial pixel area/perimeter ratios of individual cells as a measure of network interconnectivity. (***, P<.001; *****, P<.00001; Student t test, n=10) (C) Western blot analysis of whole cell lysates from BAF-treated C2C12s. (D) Quantification of western blots in C. GM, growth medium.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 6. Electron micrographs of differentiating C2C12s treated with BAF. Transmission electron microscopy was performed on differentiating C2C12s treated with 100 nM BAF to examine alterations in mitochondrial populations. Insets are presented at higher magnification below each original image. Scale bars: 500 nm. GM, growth medium.
Figure 6. Electron micrographs of differentiating C2C12s treated with BAF. Transmission electron microscopy was performed on differentiating C2C12s treated with 100 nM BAF to examine alterations in mitochondrial populations. Insets are presented at higher magnification below each original image. Scale bars: 500 nm. GM, growth medium.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 7. Myogenic differentiation is accompanied by mitophagy and biogenesis. Differentiating C2C12s were analyzed for mitophagy and biogenesis markers. (A) Differentiating C2C12s immunostained for TOMM70A (green) and imaged via fluorescence microscopy. All images were collected under identical illumination and exposure parameters. Scale bars: 20 µm. (B) Western blot analysis of whole cell lysates from differentiating C2C12s. (C) Quantification of western blots in B. Whole lysate blots were normalized to ARHGDIA. (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; Student t test; representative western blot is shown, n=3). (D) Differentiating C2C12s were immunostained for PPARGC1A (red) as well as with Hoechst 33342 nuclear stain (blue) and examined via fluorescence microscopy. All images were collected under identical illumination and exposure parameters. Scale bars: 20 µm. (E) Quantification of the percentage of PPARGC1A+ nuclei over total nuclei (100 nuclei counted per condition). GM, growth medium.
Figure 7. Myogenic differentiation is accompanied by mitophagy and biogenesis. Differentiating C2C12s were analyzed for mitophagy and biogenesis markers. (A) Differentiating C2C12s immunostained for TOMM70A (green) and imaged via fluorescence microscopy. All images were collected under identical illumination and exposure parameters. Scale bars: 20 µm. (B) Western blot analysis of whole cell lysates from differentiating C2C12s. (C) Quantification of western blots in B. Whole lysate blots were normalized to ARHGDIA. (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; Student t test; representative western blot is shown, n=3). (D) Differentiating C2C12s were immunostained for PPARGC1A (red) as well as with Hoechst 33342 nuclear stain (blue) and examined via fluorescence microscopy. All images were collected under identical illumination and exposure parameters. Scale bars: 20 µm. (E) Quantification of the percentage of PPARGC1A+ nuclei over total nuclei (100 nuclei counted per condition). GM, growth medium.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 8. Assessment of mitochondrial turnover via MitoTimer. Mitochondrial turnover was examined in differentiating C2C12s expressing MitoTimer. (A) Fluorescent images of MitoTimer-expressing C2C12s throughout differentiation. All images were collected under identical illumination and exposure parameters. Scale bars: 20 µm. (B) Red/green ratios based on images from A. Three fields were analyzed per time point. (C) PE/FITC ratios of differentiating MitoTimer-expressing C2C12s as measured by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. 50,000 events were analyzed per time point. GM, growth medium.
Figure 8. Assessment of mitochondrial turnover via MitoTimer. Mitochondrial turnover was examined in differentiating C2C12s expressing MitoTimer. (A) Fluorescent images of MitoTimer-expressing C2C12s throughout differentiation. All images were collected under identical illumination and exposure parameters. Scale bars: 20 µm. (B) Red/green ratios based on images from A. Three fields were analyzed per time point. (C) PE/FITC ratios of differentiating MitoTimer-expressing C2C12s as measured by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. 50,000 events were analyzed per time point. GM, growth medium.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 9. Myotubes are populated with more tightly coupled mitochondria fortified with increased OXPHOS machinery. Undifferentiated C2C12 myoblasts and differentiated myotubes 6 d PD were examined for qualitative differences in mitochondria. (A) OCRs of isolated mitochondria from myoblasts (Blast Mito) or myotubes (Tube Mito). Palmitoyl carnitine was used as the substrate. Average coupled ratios are presented below. (B) OCRs of intact myoblasts or myotubes using palmitate as the substrate. (C) Western blot analysis detecting OXPHOS complex proteins in mitochondria isolated from myoblasts or myotubes. (D) Quantification of MT-CO1 western blot (*, P < 0.05; Student t test; representative western blot is shown, n=3). GM, growth medium.
Figure 9. Myotubes are populated with more tightly coupled mitochondria fortified with increased OXPHOS machinery. Undifferentiated C2C12 myoblasts and differentiated myotubes 6 d PD were examined for qualitative differences in mitochondria. (A) OCRs of isolated mitochondria from myoblasts (Blast Mito) or myotubes (Tube Mito). Palmitoyl carnitine was used as the substrate. Average coupled ratios are presented below. (B) OCRs of intact myoblasts or myotubes using palmitate as the substrate. (C) Western blot analysis detecting OXPHOS complex proteins in mitochondria isolated from myoblasts or myotubes. (D) Quantification of MT-CO1 western blot (*, P < 0.05; Student t test; representative western blot is shown, n=3). GM, growth medium.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 10. Schematic of mitochondrial remodeling during differentiation. (A) Myoblasts rely primarily on glycolysis and to a lesser extent glucose oxidation and contain sparsely-populated networks of mitochondria. (B) With a differentiation stimulus, mitochondrial fission protein DNM1L and mitophagy receptor protein SQSTM1 are upregulated, leading to mitochondrial fragmentation and mitophagy. (C) Following clearance of the myoblast mitochondria, new mitochondria are synthesized via PPARGC1A-mediated biogenesis. These new mitochondria which rely primarily on fatty acid oxidation, are more tightly-coupled and better equipped to perform OXPHOS. Dense mitochondrial networks are established via OPA1-mediated fusion.
Figure 10. Schematic of mitochondrial remodeling during differentiation. (A) Myoblasts rely primarily on glycolysis and to a lesser extent glucose oxidation and contain sparsely-populated networks of mitochondria. (B) With a differentiation stimulus, mitochondrial fission protein DNM1L and mitophagy receptor protein SQSTM1 are upregulated, leading to mitochondrial fragmentation and mitophagy. (C) Following clearance of the myoblast mitochondria, new mitochondria are synthesized via PPARGC1A-mediated biogenesis. These new mitochondria which rely primarily on fatty acid oxidation, are more tightly-coupled and better equipped to perform OXPHOS. Dense mitochondrial networks are established via OPA1-mediated fusion.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dedieu S, 2002, Int J Dev Biol, 46, 235
  2. Burattini S, 2004, Eur J Histochem, 48, 223

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sin, J., Andres, A. M., Taylor, D. J. R., Weston, T., Hiraumi, Y., Stotland, A., Kim, B. J., Huang, C., Doran, K. S., & Gottlieb, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
Corresponding author
Gottlieb, Roberta A.
Venue
Autophagy
Published
2016-02-01
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
369-380
ISSN
  • 1554-8627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-8635
OpenAlex
W2280853449
Cited by
385
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 8
FWCI
16.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autophagy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01HL112730, T32HL116273)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
Keywords
mitophagy, mitochondrial biogenesis, myogenesis, C2C12 myoblasts, Drp1, mitochondrial fragmentation, p62, PGC-1α, OPA1, mitochondrial fusion, oxidative phosphorylation, mitochondrial network remodeling, myotube formation, skeletal muscle development
MeSH terms
Animals, Organelle Biogenesis, Cell Differentiation, Cell Line, Mitochondria, Models, Biological, Oxidative Phosphorylation, Muscle Fibers, Skeletal, Macrolides, Muscle Development, Myoblasts, Mice, Mitophagy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review