Cited by 69

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

USP14 regulates DNA damage repair by targeting RNF168-dependent ubiquitination

Sharma, Arishya, Alswillah, Turkeya, Singh, Kamini, Chatterjee, Payel, Willard, Belinda, Venere, Monica, Summers, Matthew K., Almasan, Alexandru·2018·Autophagy

Abstract

Recent reports have made important revelations, uncovering direct regulation of DNA damage response (DDR)-associated proteins and chromatin ubiquitination (Ubn) by macroautophagy/autophagy. Here, we report a previously unexplored connection between autophagy and DDR, via a deubiquitnase (DUB), USP14. Loss of autophagy in prostate cancer cells led to unrepaired DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) as indicated by persistent ionizing radiation (IR)-induced foci (IRIF) formation for γH2AFX, and decreased protein levels and IRIF formation for RNF168, an E3-ubiquitin ligase essential for chromatin Ubn and recruitment of critical DDR effector proteins in response to DSBs, including TP53BP1. Consistently, RNF168-associated Ubn signaling and TP53BP1 IRIF formation were reduced in autophagy-deficient cells. An activity assay identified several DUBs, including USP14, which showed higher activity in autophagy-deficient cells. Importantly, inhibiting USP14 could overcome DDR defects in autophagy-deficient cells. USP14 IRIF formation and protein stability were increased in autophagy-deficient cells. Co-immunoprecipitation and colocalization of USP14 with MAP1LC3B and the UBA-domain of SQSTM1 identified USP14 as a substrate of autophagy and SQSTM1. Additionally, USP14 directly interacted with RNF168, which depended on the MIU1 domain of RNF168. These findings identify USP14 as a novel substrate of autophagy and regulation of RNF168-dependent Ubn and TP53BP1 recruitment by USP14 as a critical li…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15548627.2018.1496877

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. 10.1038/nrc3007 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.041 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.041 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/nrm3719 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.001 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.09.015 · DOI
  7. 10.1074/jbc.M113.459917 · DOI
  8. 10.4161/cc.26814 · DOI
  9. 10.1073/pnas.1309085110 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/nar/gkv613 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/nar/gkt622 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nature09297 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.01.030 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.0807485106 · DOI
  15. 10.1128/MCB.00847-15 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.018 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1038/nature06639 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1038/cddis.2013.155 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.4161/auto.8.2.18600 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1186/1476-4598-13-70 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02313.x · DOI
  22. 10.1002/pros.22487 · DOI
  23. 10.4161/auto.20353 · DOI
  24. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0620 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.drup.2010.04.002 · DOI
  26. 10.1186/s13014-017-0795-y · DOI
  27. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0589 · DOI
  28. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0802 · DOI
  29. 10.4161/auto.6.1.10325 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.05.025 · DOI
  31. 10.1172/JCI40027 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.04.014 · DOI
  33. 10.1101/gad.1565707 · DOI
  34. 10.1101/gad.1545107 · DOI
  35. 10.1084/jem.20101145 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.4161/auto.8901 · DOI
  37. 10.1083/jcb.201212110 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1038/nature09803 · DOI
  39. 10.1073/pnas.1409563112 · DOI
  40. 10.1128/MCB.01044-14 · DOI
  41. 10.1080/15548627.2016.1210368 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.027 · DOI
  43. 10.4161/auto.5.4.7667 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05260.x · DOI
  45. 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.003 · DOI
  46. 10.1172/JCI28833 · DOI
  47. 10.1007/978-1-61779-998-3_40 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.042 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/nature09299 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1038/nature15401 · DOI
  51. 10.7554/eLife.20922 · DOI
  52. 10.1186/s11658-016-0031-z · DOI
  53. 10.1083/jcb.200507002 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1093/emboj/20.18.5187 · DOI
  55. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03409.x · DOI
  56. 10.1038/nature17433 · DOI
  57. 10.1074/jbc.M116.763128 · DOI
  58. 10.5483/BMBRep.2014.47.9.128 · DOI
  59. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1015 · DOI
  60. 10.1038/emboj.2012.232 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.01.021 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1101/gad.285122.116 · DOI
  63. 10.1074/jbc.C112.446682 · DOI
  64. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400629 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sharma, A., Alswillah, T., Singh, K., Chatterjee, P., Willard, B., Venere, M., Summers, M. K., & Almasan, A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • Proteomics and Metabolomics Core, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • Department of Radiation Oncology and the Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
Venue
Autophagy
Published
2018-08-10
Volume
14
Issue
11
Pages
1976-1990
ISSN
  • 1554-8627
  • 1554-8635
Cited by
69
References
4
Language
en
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM112895)
  • HHS | NIH | National Cancer Institute (CA184137, P30CA043703)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review