Cited by 16Epigenetics and DNA MethylationNutrition, Genetics, and DiseaseParaoxonase enzyme and polymorphisms

Differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in PON3 gene between responders and non-responders to a weight loss dietary intervention: a new tool for precision management of obesity

Open access
Salas-Pérez, Francisca, Cuevas-Sierra, Amanda, Cuervo, Marta, Goni, Leticia, Milagro, Fermín I., Martínez, J. Alfredo, Riezu-Boj, José Ignacio·2022·Epigenetics

Abstract

Differentially methylated regions (DMR) are genomic regions with different methylation status. The aim of this research was to identify DMRs in subjects with obesity that predict the response to a weight-loss dietary intervention and its association with metabolic variables. Based on the change in body mass index (BMI), 201 subjects with overweight and obesity were categorized in tertiles according to their response to a hypocaloric diet: Responders (R; n = 64) and Non-Responders (NR; n = 63). The R group lost 4.55 ± 0.91 BMI units (kg/m2) and the NR group lost 1.95 ± 0.73 kg/m2 (p < 0.001). DNA methylation was analysed in buffy coat through a methylation array at baseline. DMRs were analysed using a function of ChAMP (Chip Analysis Methylation Pipeline) in R software. Baseline DNA methylation analysis between R and NR exhibited a DMR located at paraoxonase 3 gene (PON3) consisting of 13 CpG sites, eleven of them significantly hypermethylated in R. To analyse the implication of these 11 CpGs on weight loss, a z-score was performed as a measure of DMR methylation. This analysis showed a correlation between PON3 DNA methylation and BMI loss. This z-score negatively correlated with PON3 protein serum levels. Total paraoxonase activity in serum was not different between groups, but PON enzymatic activity positively correlated with oxidized LDL levels. The present study identified a DMR within PON3 gene that is related to PON3 protein levels in serum, and that could be used as a potential biomarker to predict the response to weight-loss dietary interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15592294.2021.1873629

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In non-invasive brain stimulation and other intervention studies, non-responders are routinely excluded or treated differently.

    “in non-invasive brain stimulation studies84,85 or other intervention studies, such as those focusing on physical exercise or nutrition86–89, ‘non-responders’ are routinely excluded from data analyses or treated differently.”

    From Near transfer to an unrelated N-back task mediates the effect of N-back working memory training on matrix reasoning (2022) · cites this paper as [87]

    The Study design section (page unavailable) says this dietary-intervention study separated responders from non-responders for analysis, supporting the claim that they were treated differently in this instance. It did not exclude non-responders: it excluded participants with poor dietary adherence and those in the intermediate response tertile. One study also cannot establish that this practice is routine, and this paper does not address brain stimulation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salas-Pérez, F., Cuevas-Sierra, A., Cuervo, M., Goni, L., Milagro, F. I., Martínez, J. A., & Riezu-Boj, J. I.
Affiliations
  • Department of Nutrition, Food Science and Physiology, Center for Nutrition Research, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  • Navarre Institute of Health Research (ES)
  • IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
Venue
Epigenetics
Published
2021-01-25
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
81-92
ISSN
  • 1559-2294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-2308
OpenAlex
W3118998628
Cited by
16
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epigenetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Gobierno de Navarra (CB12/03/30002, PT024)
  • Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (CB12/03/30002)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Paraoxonase enzyme and polymorphisms
Keywords
differentially methylated regions, PON3, DNA methylation, obesity, hypocaloric diet, treatment response prediction, biomarkers, CpG hypermethylation, body mass index, oxidized LDL, paraoxonase activity, precision medicine
MeSH terms
Diet, Reducing, Humans, Obesity, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, DNA Methylation, Aryldialkylphosphatase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review