Cited by 86Stress and Burnout ResearchPolicing Practices and PerceptionsWorkplace Health and Well-being

Measuring policing stress meaningfully: Establishing norms and cut-off values for the Operational and Organizational Police Stress Questionnaires

McCreary, Donald R., Fong, Ivy, Groll, Dianne L.·2017·Police Practice and Research

Abstract

The Operational and Organizational Police Stress Questionnaires (PSQ-Op and PSQ-Org) are useful tools for understanding individual differences in the perception of policing-specific stress. However, two of the limitations of the PSQ-Op and PSQ-Org are their lack of normative values that provide organizations with a baseline with which to judge the effectiveness of stress-reduction interventions or new resilience-based training initiatives and cut-offs that can identify the percentage of employees who might be experiencing high, moderate, and low levels of policing-specific stress. Specifically, they do not allow individual departments or policing organizations to assess the relative degree of work-related stress their members are experiencing, or to determine whether that level of stress is excessive. To address this gap in knowledge, we developed gender-based norms and cut-off values for the two PSQ measures. These norms are provided for both overall scale scores and individual items, and implications for addressing officer stress are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15614263.2017.1363965

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • McCreary et al. (2017) established norms and cut-off values for the PSQ-Op, with values below 2.0 indicating low stress, between 2.1 and 3.4 moderate stress, and above 3.5 high stress.

    “In later developments, McCreary et al. (2017) established norms and cut-off values, with values below 2.0 indicating low stress, between 2.1 and 3.4 moderate stress, and above 3.5 high stress.”
  • Previous research has supported the use of the operational and organizational constructs in a wide variety of PSP occupations, including police, firefighters, paramedics, and corrections.

    “Previous research has supported the use of the operational and organizational constructs in a wide variety of PSP occupations, including police [13,28,29], firefighters [30], paramedics [31], and corrections [32].”
  • The PSQ-Org and PSQ-Op items are not specific to policing and can apply to other PSP professionals; the scales have been used successfully with a wide range of PSP.

    “Despite the scale titles, none of the items are specific to policing, such that each item can apply to other PSP professionals; indeed, the scales have been used successfully with a wide range of PSP [28,29,30,31,32].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCreary, D. R., Fong, I., & Groll, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Brock University (CA)
  • Queen's University (CA)
Corresponding author
Groll, Dianne L.
Venue
Police Practice and Research
Published
2017-08-18
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
612-623
ISSN
  • 1477-271X (ISSN-L)
  • 1561-4263
OpenAlex
W2748344695
Cited by
86
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Police Practice and Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Tema Conter Memorial Trust
  • Queen’s University Department of Psychiatry
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
reference values, cut-off values, gender differences, police officers, occupational stress, stress measurement, resilience training, stress reduction intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review