Cited by 28Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchStress and Burnout ResearchWorkplace Health and Well-being

Influence of organizational stress on reported depressive symptoms among police

Chan, J F, Andersen, J P·2020·Occupational Medicine

Abstract

Background: There is a growing body of research on operational stress injuries (OSIs) among police officers and first responders. Most studies focus on operational stressors’ contribution to OSI and the development of post-traumatic stress disorder. However, preliminary research shows that organizational stressors may uniquely contribute to OSI and depression, and thus should be examined more closely. Aims: This study explored the influence of organizational stress on symptoms of depression in a sample of police officers from a large urban region. Methods: Front-line (n = 109) police officers completed questionnaires measuring police organizational and operational stress, depression, anxiety, hostility, rumination, perceived social support and social desirability. Using negative binomial regression (NBR), a best subset model of self-reported depression symptoms was derived from the full model (a function of gender, age, police experience (years), organizational stress, operational stress, anxiety, anger, rumination and social support), based on Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) goodness of fit. Results: Organizational stress and anxiety were positively associated with self-reported depression symptoms. A paired t-test revealed no significant difference between reported organizational and operational stress levels. Conclusions: Organizational stress may uniquely contribute to OSI and depressive symptoms and should be examined in future research. Findings support prior literature suggesting that initiatives to treat OSI among police should address workplace environment and organizational stressors. Addressing organizational issues in police culture and developing long-lasting initiatives is key in the future of OSI prevention and treatment for police officers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/occmed/kqaa141

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chan, J. F., & Andersen, J. P.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Andersen, J P
Venue
Occupational Medicine
Published
2020-08-17
Volume
70
Issue
7
Pages
496-502
ISSN
  • 0962-7480 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-8405
OpenAlex
W3050457853
Cited by
28
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Occupational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Government of Ontario Ministry of Labour (ROP 15-R-021)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
organizational stress, operational stress, police officers, depressive symptoms, operational stress injuries, anxiety, rumination, social support, hostility, occupational stressors, police culture, first responders
MeSH terms
Occupational Stress, Rumination, Cognitive, Adult, Anger, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Ontario, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Police

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review