Cited by 26Wildlife Ecology and ConservationPrimate Behavior and EcologyMarine animal studies overview

Distribution and status of the hippopotamids in the Ivory Coast

Roth, Harald H., Hoppe-Dominik, Bernd, Mühlenberg, Michael, Steinhauer-Burkart, Bernd, Fischer, Frauke·2004·African Zoology

Abstract

The distribution and relative abundance of the common hippo (Hippopotamus amphibius) and the pygmy hippo (Hexaprotodon liberiensis) was studied in the Ivory Coast between 1978 and 1986 by questionnaire survey, interviews, local field investigations and aerial censuses. In addition, the size of the pygmy hippo population in the Tai Forest area was monitored between 1995 and 2001. At the time of the initial study, the common hippo inhabited the Sassandra, Bandama and Comoé rivers, but was abundant only in the Upper Comoé. The pygmy hippo was restricted to the Guinean Forest zone between 7°25’N (Tiapleu Forest Reserve (Forêts Classée)) in the north and 4°18’W (estuary of the Agnebi River) in the east, where it was abundant in undisturbed rainforest areas. Population data are presented from the Comoé, Tai and Azagny national parks where the ecology of both species was studied in greater detail. The total popu lation of the common hippopotamus was estimated at about 1100 animals in 1978 1984, of which at least 70% concentrated during the dry season in the Upper Comoé, Leraba and Iringou rivers. The average dry season population density in the Comoé varied at that time between three and four animals per river kilometre, in groups of five to six, but had dropped to one to two per kilometre in 2002. During the rainy season hippos disperse upstream into smaller tributaries and downstream as far as the coast. As the forest zone is modified by forestry and agriculture, small herds of co…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15627020.2004.11657218

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 26

Authors
Roth, H. H., Hoppe-Dominik, B., Mühlenberg, M., Steinhauer-Burkart, B., & Fischer, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Hoppe-Dominik, Bernd
Venue
African Zoology
Published
2004-10
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
211-224
ISSN
  • 1562-7020 (ISSN-L)
  • 2224-073X
OpenAlex
W2471972404
Cited by
26
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • African Zoology (publishedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
hippopotamids, common hippopotamus, hippopotamus, pygmy hippopotamus, population density, population distribution, population decline (ecology), hunting pressure, habitat degradation, seasonal dispersal, sympatry, Taï National Park, Comoé River, rainforest habitat

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review