CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35Critical Race Theory in EducationEducation Discipline and InequalityCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“Tryin’ to Survive”: Black Male Students’ Understandings of the Role of Race and Racism in the School-to-Prison Pipeline

Grace, Jennifer E., Nelson, Steven L.·2019·Leadership and Policy in Schools
DOI 10.1080/15700763.2018.1513154
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article examines Black male students’ perceptions of the role of race and racism in perpetuating the school-to-prison pipeline. Through a phenomenological investigation of ten Black male students in the New Orleans area, this article finds that Black male students perceive racism in society, racism in schools, and poor teacher expectations to aid in the perpetuation of the school-to-prison pipeline. Furthermore, the participants of this study revealed that schools may use other Black males who have successfully navigated the educational system to better reach Black male students who are placed at risk of the school-to-prison pipeline. This article considers the responses of theses Black male students to the role of race and racism in the context of critical race theory.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15700763.2018.1513154

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. Alexander M., 2010, The new jim crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness
  2. American Values Institute, 2013, Transforming perception: Black men and boys
  3. 10.3149/jms.1201.15 · DOI
  4. 10.1037/1045-3830.23.1.3 · DOI
  5. Bell D. A., 1976, Notre Dame Law, 52, 5
  6. Boyd T. M., 2009, Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 44, 571
  7. Brown v. Board of Education, 1954, Brown v
  8. 10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.292 · DOI
  9. California Safe and Supportive Schools, 2011, What works brief: Caring relationships and high expectations (No. 1)
  10. Children’s Defense Fund, 1975, School suspensions: Are they helping children?
  11. Clemson C. E., 2015, The prison path: School practices that hurt our youth
  12. Community Voices, 2008, The secret epidemic: Exploring the mental health crisis affecting adolescent African-American males
  13. 10.1086/JAAHv90n1-2p107 · DOI
  14. Corra M., 2011, The Journal of Negro Education, 80, 33
  15. Creswell J. W., 1998, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions
  16. Delgado R., 2001, Critical race theory: An introduction
  17. 10.1353/hsj.2007.0000 · DOI
  18. 10.1177/1077800414557826 · DOI
  19. 10.1177/0042085907305039 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/001440291207800401 · DOI
  21. 10.1177/003172171109300204 · DOI
  22. Frankenberg E., 2012, Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 8, 3
  23. 10.1086/JAAHv93n3p410 · DOI
  24. 10.2307/2295624 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/02680930500132346 · DOI
  26. Green P. C., 2012, Washington & Lee Journal of Civil Rights & Social Justice, 18, 253
  27. 10.1080/10665680490429280 · DOI
  28. Hampton, C. M. (2007).A study of perceptions of achievement factors for at risk students in comparison to honor students at a Northeast Tennessee high school(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN.
  29. Hamre B. K., 2006, Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention, 59
  30. 10.4135/9781848607941.n13 · DOI
  31. Horn J., 2013, The mismeasure of education
  32. Howard T. C., 2008, Teachers College Record, 110, 954, 10.1177/016146810811000507 · DOI
  33. Hucks D. C., 2011, The Journal of Negro Education, 80, 339
  34. Institute on Race and Poverty, 2010, The state of public schools in post-Katrina New Orleans: The challenge of creating equal opportunity
  35. James O. R., 2014, Iowa Law Review, 99, 1083
  36. 10.1177/0021934704273931 · DOI
  37. Kim C., 2010, The school-to-prison pipeline: Structuring legal reform
  38. 10.1177/0013124517714310 · DOI
  39. 10.1080/095183998236863 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1207/s15430421tip3903_5 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1080/15582150903280656 · DOI
  43. Martin D., 2007, Adolescence, 42, 689
  44. McFadden A. C., 1992, Education and Treatment of Children, 15, 140
  45. Merriam S. B., 2002, Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis
  46. 10.4135/9781412995658 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Nasir N. S., 2012, Racialized identities: Race and achievement among African American youth
  48. National Education Policy Center, 2012, Spending by the major charter management organizations: Comparing charter school and local public district financial resources in New York, Ohio, and Texas
  49. National Education Policy Center, 2012, Chartering equity: Using charter school legislation and policy to advance equal educational opportunity
  50. Nelson S. L., 2016, Washington & Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice, 22, 297
  51. Nelson S. L., 2017, Georgetown Journal of Law and Modern Critical Race Perspectives, 9, 1
  52. Nelson S. L., 2018, National Black Law Journal, 27(1), 1–58
  53. Nelson S. L., 2016, Nova Law Review, 40, 447
  54. Noguera P. A., 1997, Social Justice, 24, 147
  55. 10.1177/0042085903038004005 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Paige R., 2010, The Black-White Achievement Gap: Why closing it is the greatest civil rights issue of our time
  57. Rocque M., 2011, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 101, 633
  58. 10.1177/0042085903256221 · DOI
  59. Rowley R. L., 2011, The Journal of Negro Education, 80, 93
  60. Saldaña J, 2012, The coding manual for qualitative researcher
  61. Schott Foundation for Public Education, 2014, Black lives matter: The schott 50 state report on public education and black males
  62. 10.1023/A:1021320817372 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Smith C. D., 2009, Fordham Urban Law Journal, 36, 1009
  64. Southern Poverty Law Center, 2010, Access denied: New Orleans students and parents identify barriers to public education
  65. Toldson I. A., 2008, Breaking barriers: Plotting the path to academic success for school-age African-American males
  66. 10.1177/001440290006600308 · DOI
  67. 10.1353/hsj.2007.0009 · DOI
  68. University of California Los Angeles, 2010, Beyond the rhetoric of charter school reform: A study of ten California school districts
  69. 10.4219/jsge-2006-407 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1111/j.1744-6171.2007.00119.x · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Grace, J. E., & Nelson, S. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Indianapolis (US)
  • University of Memphis (US)
Corresponding author
Grace, Jennifer E.
ORCID
Venue
Leadership and Policy in Schools
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2018-09-24
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
664-680
ISSN
  • 1570-0763 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5043
DOI
10.1080/15700763.2018.1513154
OpenAlex
W2893735518
Cited by
35
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Leadership and Policy in Schools (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Keywords
school-to-prison pipeline, Black male students, racism in schools, race and education, teacher expectations, critical race theory, student perceptions, at-risk students, New Orleans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review