Cited by 31Climate variability and modelsOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesMarine and coastal ecosystems

Recent subsurface North Atlantic cooling trend in context of Atlantic decadal-to-multidecadal variability

Open access
Ruiz-Barradas, Alfredo, Chafik, Léon, Nigam, Sumant, Häkkinen, Sirpa·2018·Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography

Abstract

The spatiotemporal structure of the recent decadal subsurface cooling trend in the North Atlantic Ocean is analyzed in the context of the phase reversal of Atlantic multidecadal variability. A vertically integrated ocean heat content (HC) Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation index (AMO-HC) definition is proposed in order to capture the thermal state of the ocean and not just that of the surface as in the canonical AMO SST-based indices. The AMO-HC (5–657 m) index (defined over the area, 0°N–60°N, 5°W–75°W) indicates that: (1) The traditional surface AMO index lags the heat content (and subsurface temperatures) with the leading time being latitude-dependent. (2) The North Atlantic subsurface was in a warming trend since the mid-1980s to the mid-2000s, a feature that was also present at the surface with a lag of 3 years. (3) The North Atlantic subsurface is in a cooling trend since the mid-2000s with significant implications for predicting future North Atlantic climate. The spatial structure of decadal trends in upper-ocean heat content (5–657 m) in the North Atlantic prior to and after 2006 suggests a link with variability of the Gulf Stream–Subpolar Gyre system. The Gulf Stream leads variability in upper-ocean heat content over the Subpolar region by ∼13 years, and the lead increases from east to west from the Iceland Basin to the Irminger Sea to the Labrador Sea. The similarity between the structure of decadal mean anomalies, their change and trends in upper-ocean heat content and salinity in the North Atlantic and anomalies associated with a Gulf Stream index is striking. In this scheme, the displacements of the Gulf Stream–North Atlantic Current systems and their interactions with the Subpolar Gyre, as part of the meridional overturning circulation, have a decisive role for imposing decadal variability in both the Ocean and hydroclimate over the neighbouring continents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16000870.2018.1481688

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sub-Greenland gyre SSTA variability is consistent with subsurface temperature trends (warming from the mid-80s to 2006 and cooling thereafter), with a time-lag between subsurface temperatures and subsequent surface temperature signals.

    “It is also consistent with the subsurface temperature trends (warming from the mid-80’s to 2006 and cooling thereafter), with a time-lag between subsurface temperatures and subsequent surface temperature signals41.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. (self.__next_s=self.__next_s||[]).push([0,{"children":"window.__ENV__ = {\"RECAPTCHA_SITE_KEY\":\"6Le5r8IkAAAAAHMkHq5S2Em4RKx3Xyk5my0v9HnE\",\"SERVICE_CODE\":\"su-j-tadmo\",\"FRONTEND_URL\":\"https://tellusjournal.org\",\"FRONTEND_DOMAIN\":\"tellusjournal.org\",\"OJS_API_URL\":\"https://api.account.su-j-tadmo.ubiquityjournal.website/api/journal/1\"};","id":"public-env"}])This page is for printing. If you wish to read this article, please visit its full version.Recent subsurface North Atlantic cooling trend in context of Atlantic decadal-to-multidecadal variabilityAlfredo Ruiz-BarradasLéon ChafikSumant NigamSirpa HäkkinenAbstractThe spatiotemporal structure of the recent decadal subsurface cooling trend in the North Atlantic Ocean is analyzed in the context of the phase reversal of Atlantic multidecadal variability. A vertically integrated ocean heat content (HC) Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation index (AMO-HC) definition is proposed in order to capture the thermal state of the ocean and not just that of the surface as in the canonical AMO SST-based indices. The AMO-HC (5–657 m) index (defined over the area, 0°N–60°N, 5°W–75°W) indicates that: (1) The traditional surface AMO index lags the heat content (and subsurface temperatures) with the leading time being latitude-dependent. (2) The North Atlantic subsurface was in a warming trend since the mid-1980s to the mid-2000s, a feature that was also present at the surface with a lag of 3 years. (3) The North Atlantic subsurface is in a cooling trend since the mid-2000s with significant implications for predicting future North Atlantic climate. The spatial structure of decadal trends in upper-ocean heat content (5–657 m) in the North Atlantic prior to and after 2006 suggests a link with variability of the Gulf Stream–Subpolar Gyre system. The Gulf Stream leads variability in upper-ocean heat content over the Subpolar region by ∼13 years, and the lead increases from east to west from the Iceland Basin to the Irminger Sea to the Labrador Sea. The similarity between the structure of decadal mean anomalies, their change and trends in upper-ocean heat content and salinity in the North Atlantic and anomalies associated with a Gulf Stream index is striking. In this scheme, the displacements of the Gulf Stream–North Atlantic Current systems and their interactions with the Subpolar Gyre, as part of the meridional overturning circulation, have a decisive role for imposing decadal variability in both the Ocean and hydroclimate over the neighbouring continents.Year: 2018Volume: 70 Issue: 1Page/Article: 1481688DOI: 10.1080/16000870.2018.1481688Accepted on May 18, 2018Published on Jan 1, 2018Peer ReviewedCC BY 4.0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruiz-Barradas, A., Chafik, L., Nigam, S., & Häkkinen, S.
Affiliations
  • Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research (NO)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Chafik, Léon
Venue
Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography
Published
2018-01-01
Volume
70
Issue
1
Pages
1481688
ISSN
  • 0280-6495 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0870
OpenAlex
W2846056831
Cited by
31
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tellus A Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • iNcREASE project
  • US National Science Foundation (AGS1439940)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
Keywords
Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, ocean heat content, upper ocean heat content, decadal variability, phase reversal, North Atlantic Current, meridional overturning circulation, salinity change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review