Cited by 9Sexual function and dysfunction studiesPelvic floor disorders treatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

An initial proof of concept: a replicated single-case study of a CBT group treatment with partner involvement for vulvodynia

Open access
Engman, Linnéa, Ter Kuile, Moniek M., Linton, Steven J., Ekholm, Elin, Tuijnman-Raasveld, Charlotte C., Flink, Ida K.·2022·Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

Abstract

Vulvodynia is common and has an immense impact on affected women and their partners. Psychological factors have been found to contribute to pain maintenance and exacerbation, and treatments addressing psychological factors have yielded positive results. This study employed a replicated single-case experimental design to examine a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) group treatment with partner involvement in vulvodynia. Repeated measures of pain intensity related to pain-inflicting behaviors were collected weekly throughout baseline and treatment phases. Associated outcomes were measured pre-, post- and at two follow-up assessments. Participants were 18-45-year-old women, in a stable sexual relationship with a man, experiencing vulvodynia. Five women completed the treatment consisting of 10 group sessions and 3 couple sessions. Data were analyzed through visual inspection and supplementary nonparametric calculations. The study showed promising results of the CBT treatment in alleviating pain intensity in connection to specific pain-inflicting behavior since three out of five participants showed improvements. For the participants who improved, sexual function, pain catastrophizing, avoidance, and endurance behavior changed during treatment and were maintained at follow-ups. These results warrant further study of the CBT treatment, in larger, and controlled formats.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16506073.2022.2086907

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychological treatments based on cognitive behavioral therapy and acceptance-based treatments for vulvar pain and sexual function have proved beneficial.

    “Psychological treatments based on cognitive behavioral therapy and acceptance-based treatments for vulvar pain and sexual function have proved beneficial. 11-13”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Engman, L., Ter Kuile, M. M., Linton, S. J., Ekholm, E., Tuijnman-Raasveld, C. C., & Flink, I. K.
Affiliations
  • Örebro University (SE)
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Engman, Linnéa
Venue
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Published
2022-08-12
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
503-519
ISSN
  • 1650-6073 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2316
OpenAlex
W4290878489
Cited by
9
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
vulvodynia, cognitive behavioral therapy, group therapy, partner involvement, couple therapy, pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, sexual function, avoidance behavior, psychological factors in pain
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Young Adult, Vulvodynia, Catastrophization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review