Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 408

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Who is a community health worker? – a systematic review of definitions

Open access
Olaniran, Abimbola, Smith, Helen, Unkels, Regine, Bar-Zeev, Sarah, van den Broek, Nynke·2017·Global Health Action

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Community health workers (CHWs) can play vital roles in increasing coverage of basic health services. However, there is a need for a systematic categorisation of CHWs that will aid common understanding among policy makers, programme planners, and researchers. OBJECTIVE: To identify the common themes in the definitions and descriptions of CHWs that will aid delineation within this cadre and distinguish CHWs from other healthcare providers. DESIGN: A systematic review of peer-reviewed papers and grey literature. RESULTS: We identified 119 papers that provided definitions of CHWs in 25 countries across 7 regions. The review shows CHWs as paraprofessionals or lay individuals with an in-depth understanding of the community culture and language, have received standardised job-related training of a shorter duration than health professionals, and their primary goal is to provide culturally appropriate health services to the community. CHWs can be categorised into three groups by education and pre-service training. These are lay health workers (individuals with little or no formal education who undergo a few days to a few weeks of informal training), level 1 paraprofessionals (individuals with some form of secondary education and subsequent informal training), and level 2 paraprofessionals (individuals with some form of secondary education and subsequent formal training lasting a few months to more than a year). Lay health workers tend to provide basic health services as unpaid volunteers while level 1 paraprofessionals often receive an allowance and level 2 paraprofessionals tend to be salaried. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides a categorisation of CHWs that may be useful for health policy formulation, programme planning, and research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16549716.2017.1272223

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 116 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Lehmann U, Sanders D. Community health workers: what do we know about them? The state of the evidence on programmes, activities, costs and impact on health outcomes of using community health workers. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007. [cited 2014 May 3].
  2. Ryan R Cochrane consumers and communication review group: data synthesis and analysis. Cochrane Consum Commun Rev Gr. 2013.
  3. World Bank. Country and lending groups. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2016. [cited 2014 Nov 19].
  4. Houston R, Acharya B, Poudel D, et al. Early initiation of community-based programmes in Nepal: a historic reflection. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2012;10:82–87. Available from: http://nfhp.jsi.com/Docs/EarlyInitiationofCommunity-based ProgrammesinNepal-Ahistoricreflection.pdf
  5. Jarvis L Termini N Community health workers for maternal and child health. Population Council Fact Sheet; 2012. · doi:10.31899/rh2.1015
  6. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002774 · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002774
  7. Keane D, Nielsen C, Dower C. The community health advisor program and the deep south network for cancer control health promotion programs for volunteer community health advisors. Fam Community Health. 2004;28:20–27.
  8. Martin MY. Community health advisors effectively promote cancer screening. Ethn Dis. 2005;15:14–16.
  9. Bill D, Hock-Long L, Mesure M, et al. Healthy Start Programa Madrina: a promotora home visiting outreach and education program to improve perinatal health among latina pregnant women. Heal Educ. 2009;41:68–76.
  10. 10.1007/s10900-009-9206-0 · doi:10.1007/s10900-009-9206-0
  11. 10.1177/1524839913517711 · doi:10.1177/1524839913517711
  12. 10.3390/ijerph120911209 · doi:10.3390/ijerph120911209
  13. 10.1037/prj0000164 · doi:10.1037/prj0000164
  14. Kelkar S, Mahapatro M. Community health worker: a tool for community empowerment. Heal Popul Perspect Issues. 2014;37:57–65.
  15. 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300263 · doi:10.2105/ajph.2011.300263
  16. Health Resources and Services Association. Community health workers national workforce study. Washington (DC): Health Resources and Services Association; 2007.
  17. 10.1353/hpu.2011.0073 · doi:10.1353/hpu.2011.0073
  18. 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00137.x · doi:10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00137.x
  19. Anonymous. Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA) - the trained woman community health volunteer. Nurs J India. 2005;96:252–254.
  20. 10.1111/inr.12097 · doi:10.1111/inr.12097
  21. Naimoli JF, Frymus DE, Quain EE, et al. Community and formal health system support for enhanced community health worker performance: a US government evidence summit. Washington (DC): USAID; 2012.
  22. Frontline Health Workers Coalition. A commitment to community health workers: improving data for decision-making. Washington (DC): Frontline Health Workers Coalition; 2013.
  23. 10.1177/107327480801500309 · doi:10.1177/107327480801500309
  24. 10.1002/cncr.26265 · doi:10.1002/cncr.26265
  25. 10.1007/s10903-014-0111-y · doi:10.1007/s10903-014-0111-y
  26. 10.11124/01938924-201513080-00007 · doi:10.11124/01938924-201513080-00007
  27. 10.1186/1745-6215-15-275 · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-275
  28. 10.1371/journal.pone.0146305 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146305
  29. International Labour Office. International standard classification of occupations: structure, group definitions and correspondence tables. Geneva: Internet Labour Office; 2012.
  30. Hughes R. Employers expectations of core functions, credentials and competencies of the community and public health nutrition workforce in Australia. Nutr Diet. 2004;61:105–111.
  31. World Health Organization. Noncommunicable diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.
  32. World Health Organization, World Bank, USAID. Handbook on monitoring and evaluation of human resources for health: with special applications for low- and middle-income countries. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
  33. Lehmann U. Mid-level health workers. The state of the evidence on programmes, activities, costs and impact on health outcomes: a literature review. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
  34. Global Health Workforce Alliance. Mid-level health workers for delivery of essential health services: a global systematic review and country experiences. Geneva: Global Health Workforce Alliance; 2013.

Cited by

See all 408

Metadata

Authors
Olaniran, A., Smith, H., Unkels, R., Bar-Zeev, S., & van den Broek, N.
Venue
Global Health Action
Published
2017-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
1272223-1272223
ISSN
  • 1654-9716 (ISSN-L)
  • 1654-9880
OpenAlex
W2584393950
Cited by
408
References
116
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Who is a community health worker? – a systematic review of definitions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/16549716.2017.1272223
The paper
Olaniran, A., Smith, H., Unkels, R., Bar-Zeev, S., & van den Broek, N. (2017). Who is a community health worker? – a systematic review of definitions. Global Health Action. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1272223

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.