The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of Peer Health Coaching on Glycemic Control in Low-Income Patients With Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: Peer health coaches offer a potential model for extending the capacity of primary care practices to provide self-management support for patients with diabetes. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to test whether clinic-based peer health coaching, compared with usual care, improves glycemic control for low-income patients who have poorly controlled diabetes. METHOD: We undertook a randomized controlled trial enrolling patients from 6 public health clinics in San Francisco. Twenty-three patients with a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) level of less than 8.5%, who completed a 36-hour health coach training class, acted as peer coaches. Patients from the same clinics with HbA1C levels of 8.0% or more were recruited and randomized to receive health coaching (n = 148) or usual care (n = 151). The primary outcome was the difference in change in HbA1C levels at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were proportion of patients with a decrease in HbA1C level of 1.0% or more and proportion of patients with an HbA1C level of less than 7.5% at 6 months. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed model with and without adjustment for differences in baseline variables. RESULTS: At 6 months, HbA1C levels had decreased by 1.07% in the coached group and 0.3% in the usual care group, a difference of 0.77% in favor of coaching (P = .01, adjusted). HbA1C levels decreased 1.0% or more in 49.6% of coached patients vs 31.5% of usual care patients (P = .001, adjusted), and levels at 6 months were less than 7.5% for 22.0% of coached vs 14.9% of usual care patients (P = .04, adjusted). CONCLUSIONS: Peer health coaching significantly improved diabetes control in this group of low-income primary care patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Deakin, T. A., McShane, C. E., Cade, J. E., & Williams, R. (2005) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003417.pub2 · Cited by 862
RetractedCONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
the CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-18 · Cited by 13,371
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & for the CONSORT Group* (2010) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232 · Cited by 3,824
Effectiveness of Self-Management Training in Type 2 Diabetes
Norris, S. L., Engelgau, M. M., & Venkat Narayan, K. M. (2001) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.24.3.561 · Cited by 1,846
Diabetes Control With Reciprocal Peer Support Versus Nurse Care Management: A Randomized Trial
Heisler, M., Vijan, S., Makki, F., & Piette, J. D. (2010) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-153-8-201010190-00007 · Cited by 366
Online Diabetes Self-Management Program
Lorig, K., Ritter, P. L., Laurent, D. D., Plant, K., Green, M., Jernigan, V. B. B., & Case, S. (2010) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc09-2153 · Cited by 316
Long, J. A., Jahnle, E. C., Richardson, D. M., Loewenstein, G., & Volpp, K. G. (2012) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-156-6-201203200-00004 · Cited by 278
CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2011) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-154-4-201102150-00017 · Cited by 259
Spanish Diabetes Self-Management With and Without Automated Telephone Reinforcement
Lorig, K., Ritter, P. L., Villa, F., & Piette, J. D. (2008) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc07-1313 · Cited by 255
Cross-cultural and international adaptation of peer support for diabetes management
Fisher, E. B., Earp, J. A., Maman, S., & Zolotor, A. (2010) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/cmp013 · Cited by 101
Cited by
Chrvala, C. A., Sherr, D., & Lipman, R. D. (2016) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.003 · Cited by 914
Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions
Coulter, A., Entwistle, V. A., Eccles, A., Ryan, S., Shepperd, S., & Perera, R. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010523.pub2 · Cited by 592
Powers, M. A., Bardsley, J. K., Cypress, M., Funnell, M. M., Harms, D., Hess-Fischl, A., Hooks, B., Isaacs, D., Mandel, E. D., Maryniuk, M. D., et al. (2020) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci20-0023 · Cited by 500
Powers, M. A., Bardsley, J., Cypress, M., Duker, P., Funnell, M. M., Hess Fischl, A., Maryniuk, M. D., Siminerio, L., & Vivian, E. (2015) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc15-0730 · Cited by 492
Who is a community health worker? – a systematic review of definitions
Olaniran, A., Smith, H., Unkels, R., Bar-Zeev, S., & van den Broek, N. (2017) · Global Health Action · doi:10.1080/16549716.2017.1272223 · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Authors
- Thom, D. H., Ghorob, A., Hessler, D., De Vore, D., Chen, E., & Bodenheimer, T. A.
- Venue
- The Annals of Family Medicine
- Publisher
- Annals of Family Medicine
- Published
- 2013-03-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137-144
- ISSN
- 1544-1709 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-1717
- OpenAlex
- W2121138662
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 19.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of Peer Health Coaching on Glycemic Control in Low-Income Patients With Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1370/afm.1443
- The paper
- Thom, D. H., Ghorob, A., Hessler, D., De Vore, D., Chen, E., & Bodenheimer, T. A. (2013). Impact of Peer Health Coaching on Glycemic Control in Low-Income Patients With Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Annals of Family Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1443
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.