Cited by 56Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsBehavioral Health and InterventionsHealth, psychology, and well-being

The common sense model of self-regulation and acceptance and commitment therapy: integrating strategies to guide interventions for chronic illness

Open access
Karekla, Maria, Karademas, Evangelos C., Gloster, Andrew T.·2019·Health Psychology Review

Abstract

Most health behaviour intervention efforts are adapted from the typical psychological treatment experience and may not take into serious consideration theories specifically developed to describe the process of adaptation to illness. This paper presents a proposal for the combination of a theory about the experience of and adaptation to illness, that is, the Common Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM), and an efficient psychological theory and therapy, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). Past combinations of CSM with cognitive or cognitive-behavioural interventions have focussed almost only on specific aspects of this model (mostly, illness representations and action plans) and left out other, equally important for a fruitful adaptation to illness, recommendations of the model (e.g., regarding the system coherence). Therefore, the development of the proposed combination is to try to match a broad array of the CSM aspects with the principles, intervention techniques and methods employed by ACT, in order to produce a 'double-pillared' intervention strategy that may prove especially effective for promoting patients' adaptation to a chronic condition and enhancing their well-being and health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17437199.2018.1437550

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karekla, M., Karademas, E. C., & Gloster, A. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Cyprus (CY)
  • University of Crete (GR)
  • University of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
Karekla, Maria
Venue
Health Psychology Review
Published
2018-02-15
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
490-503
ISSN
  • 1743-7199 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-7202
OpenAlex
W2790731996
Cited by
56
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Health Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • edoc (University of Basel)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation, acceptance and commitment therapy, chronic disease, adaptation to illness, illness representations, action plan, system coherence, health behavior interventions, psychological intervention, well-being
MeSH terms
Self-Control, Adaptation, Psychological, Chronic Disease, Humans, Models, Psychological, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review