Cited by 99Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCancer survivorship and care

Religious Coping and Cancer: Proposing an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Approach

Karekla, Maria, Constantinou, Marios·2010·Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpra.2009.08.003

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karekla, M., & Constantinou, M.
Affiliations
University of Cyprus (CY)
Corresponding author
Karekla, Maria
Venue
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
371-381
ISSN
1077-7229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993174000
Cited by
99
References
64
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
religious coping, cancer, acceptance and commitment therapy, spiritual values, religious values, coping assessment, acceptance, outpatient psychotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review