Cited by 89Augmented Reality ApplicationsDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchArchaeology and Cultural Heritage

Cultural heritage, tourist attractiveness and augmented reality: insights from Italy

Graziano, Teresa, Privitera, Donatella·2020·Journal of Heritage Tourism

Abstract

In recent years, cutting-edge information and communication technologies (ICTs) have been implemented at different scales in order to improve tourists’ experiences of cultural heritage. In particular, advanced technologies combining augmented reality can offer a deeply immersive visitor’s experience aiming both at providing multifaceted information about the site and enhancing the attractiveness of a tourist destination at the different scales. Thus, the study aims at critically scrutinising the intersection of AR and tourist practices through the analysis of tourism destination stakeholders’ perceived value of AR solutions. The aim is to understand how it is crucial to take into account stakeholders’ perceptions about cutting-edge technology development, apart from providing practical implications for industry practitioners and local institutional actors.From the methodological standpoint, the article is based on a multi-method approach encompassing field-work observation, in addition to a stakeholder and case study approach, aiming at evaluating internal and external stakeholders’ perceived value through a qualitative perspective based on semi-structured interviews with institutional actors, entrepreneurs, visitors and local community representatives. The results suggested some critical reflections about the inherent elusiveness of technological innovation in the case it is not incorporated in a long-term sustainable vision.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1743873x.2020.1719116

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although several studies mention that immersive technologies enhance motivation for learning about cultural and natural heritage, very few works consider co-creation and information adaptation to improve user motivation.

    “Although several studies [13,35,42] mention that the use of immersive technologies enhances the level of motivation for learning about cultural and natural heritage, features such as co-creation and information adaptation are aspects that very few works consider improving user motivation [15,[43][44][45].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graziano, T., & Privitera, D.
Affiliations
University of Catania (IT)
Corresponding author
Graziano, Teresa
Venue
Journal of Heritage Tourism
Published
2020-03-26
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
666-679
ISSN
  • 1743-873X (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-6631
OpenAlex
W3014046907
Cited by
89
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Heritage Tourism (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
augmented reality, cultural heritage, tourist attractiveness, destination management, stakeholder perspectives, immersive visitor experience, information and communication technologies in tourism, sustainable tourism, Italy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review