The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive-behavioral, solution-focused life coaching: Enhancing goal striving, well-being, and hope
Abstract
Research is in its infancy in the newly emerging field of coaching psychology. This study examined the effects of a 10-week cognitive-behavioral, solution-focused life coaching group programme. Participants were randomly allocated to a life coaching group programme (n = 28) or a waitlist control group (n = 28). Participation in the life coaching group programme was associated with significant increases in goal striving, well-being and hope, with gains maintained up to 30 weeks later on some variables. Hope theory may explain such positive outcomes. Life coaching programmes that utilize evidence-based techniques may provide a framework for further research on psychological processes that occur in non-clinical populations who wish to make purposeful change and enhance their positive psychological functioning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“SFC can be utilized for individuals and groups (Green et al., 2006;Sharry, 2007), and has demonstrated effectiveness in both face-to-face and web-based contexts (Novella et al., 2020).”
From A Pilot Study of a Cohort-Based Solution-Focused Wellness Group for Graduate Students Using Solution-Focused Coaching 🇵🇱 🇷🇴 (2022) · cites this paper as Green et al., 2006
Citations
Cites
The satisfaction with life scale
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · Cited by 31,768
Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being.
Ryff, C. D. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069 · Cited by 14,847
On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141 · Cited by 11,567
The structure of psychological well-being revisited.
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.719 · Cited by 10,285
Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions.
Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007 · Cited by 3,322 · cited 3×
“Historically, research on well-being has highlighted two broad traditions: one relating to happiness or hedonic well-being often referred to as subjective well-being (SWB); and the other relating to human potential or eudaemonic wellbeing often referred to as psychological well-being (PWB; Keyes, Shmotkin, & Ryff, 200…”
BackgroundInfluentialGoal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content.
Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.338 · Cited by 2,319 · cited 2×
“Research on goal constructs has a longstanding history in psychological literature, particularly in regard to goal-commitment, goaldifficulty, and goal-expectancy (see Austin & Vancouver, 1996, for an extensive review).”
BackgroundPavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvik, E. (1991) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5701_17 · Cited by 1,866
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- 2003, Coaching Psychology Interest Group Mission Statement
- 10.1006/jrpe.1993.1011 · DOI · Paper page
- Elliott R, 2003, In-Psych, 20
- Emmons RA, 1986, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 662
- 10.2224/sbp.2003.31.3.253 · DOI · Paper page
- Grant AM, 2001, Coach yourself: Make real change in your life
- Green LS, 2002, “Coach yourself ” life coaching group manual
- Klinger E, 1977, Meaning and void: Inner experience and the incentives in lives
- Lovibond SH, 1995, Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales
- 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1467-6494.00176 · DOI · Paper page
- Snyder CR, 2000, Handbook of hope: Theory, measures and applications
- 10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.570 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/11132-005 · DOI
- Snyder CR, 2002, Handbook of Positive Psychology, 257
- Davis DC, 2002, Therapist as life coach: Transforming your practice
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sin, N. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.20593 · Cited by 2,955
Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
Bolier, L., Haverman, M., Westerhof, G. J., Riper, H., Smit, F., & Bohlmeijer, E. (2013) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-119 · Cited by 1,996
“Intensity varied considerably across studies, ranging from a short one-day exercise [70] and a two-week self-help intervention [65] to intensive therapy [51,82,83] and coaching [33,81].”
InfluentialPositive interventions: An emotion regulation perspective.
Quoidbach, J., Mikolajczak, M., & Gross, J. J. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0038648 · Cited by 546
A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions to improve mental wellbeing
van Agteren, J., Iasiello, M., Lo, L., Bartholomaeus, J., Kopsaftis, Z., Carey, M., & Kyrios, M. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01093-w · Cited by 510
Weiss, L. A., Westerhof, G. J., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158092 · Cited by 405
“Green, 2006 [54] normal, non-clinical population PWBS, 14 life coaching group intervention 10, 10 waiting-list 56 42.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, L. S., Oades, L. G., & Grant, A. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Positive Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 142-149
- ISSN
- 1743-9760
- 1743-9779
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
