Cited by 230Optimism, Hope, and Well-beingPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Psychometric Properties of the Hope Scale: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Babyak, Michael A., Snyder, C.R., Yoshinobu, Lauren·1993·Journal of Research in Personality

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jrpe.1993.1011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Babyak, M. A., Snyder, C. R., & Yoshinobu, L.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
Venue
Journal of Research in Personality
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-06
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
154-169
ISSN
0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058376965
Cited by
230
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
hope scale, hope, agency, pathways, psychometric properties, factor structure, measurement invariance, university students, gender differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review