The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ductility of 3D printed concrete reinforced with short straight steel fibers
Open accessAbstract
With the number of 3D printed concrete structures rapidly increasing, the demand for concepts that allow for robust and ductile printed objects becomes increasingly pressing. An obvious solution strategy is the inclusion of fibers in the printed material. In this study, the effect of adding short straight steel fibers on the failure behaviour of Weber 3D 115-1 print mortar has been studied through several CMOD tests on cast and printed concrete, on different scales. The experiments have also been simulated numerically. The research has shown that the fibers cause an important increase in flexural strength, and eliminate the strength difference between cast and printed concrete that exists without fibers. The post-peak behaviour, nevertheless, has to be characterised as strongly strain-softening. In the printed specimens, a strong fiber orientation in the direction of the filament occurs. However, this has no notable effect on the performance in the tested direction: cast and printed concrete with fibers behave similarly in the CMOD test. For the key parameters, no scale effect was found for the specimens with fibers, contrary to the ones without. Numerical modelling of the test by using the Concrete Damage Plasticity material model of Abaqus, with a Thorenfeldt-based constitutive law in compression and a customised constitutive law in tension, results in a reasonable fit with the experimental results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bos, F., Wolfs, R., Ahmed, Z., & Salet, T. (2016) · Virtual and Physical Prototyping · doi:10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867 · Cited by 1,257
Self-citationDevelopments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes
Lim, S., Buswell, R. A., Le, T. T., Austin, S. A., Gibb, A. G. F., & Thorpe, T. (2012) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.010 · Cited by 1,205
Khoshnevis, B., & Dutton, R. (1998) · Materials Technology · doi:10.1080/10667857.1998.11752766 · Cited by 207 · cited 1×
“…Modelling (FDM) process that is being developed at the Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e) and is similar to facilities at several other research institutes and commercial enterprises (Bos et al. 2016; Khoshnevis and Dutton 1998; Khoshnevis 2004; Lim et al. 2012; Wu, Wang, and Wang 2016).”
Method
Cited by
Large-scale 3D printing concrete technology: Current status and future opportunities
Xiao, J., Ji, G., Zhang, Y., Ma, G., Mechtcherine, V., Pan, J., Wang, L., Ding, T., Duan, Z., & Du, S. (2021) · Cement and Concrete Composites · doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104115 · Cited by 532
Extrusion-based concrete 3D printing from a material perspective: A state-of-the-art review
Mohan, M. K., Rahul, A. V., De Schutter, G., & Van Tittelboom, K. (2021) · Cement and Concrete Composites · doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103855 · Cited by 384
Al Rashid, A., Khan, S. A., G. Al-Ghamdi, S., & Koç, M. (2020) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103268 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Bos, F. P., Bosco, E., & Salet, T. A. M.
- Venue
- Virtual and Physical Prototyping
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-11-19
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 160-174
- ISSN
- 1745-2759 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-2767
- OpenAlex
- W2901027061
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ductility of 3D printed concrete reinforced with short straight steel fibers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17452759.2018.1548069
- The paper
- Bos, F. P., Bosco, E., & Salet, T. A. M. (2019). Ductility of 3D printed concrete reinforced with short straight steel fibers. Virtual and Physical Prototyping. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2018.1548069
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.