The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Additive manufacturing: Technology, applications, markets, and opportunities for the built environment
Open accessAbstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies (also known as 3D printing - 3DP) have been rapidly advancing into various industrial sectors, including aerospace, automotive, medical, architecture, arts and design, food, and construction. Transitioning from the visualization and prototyping stages into functional and actual part replacement opens further design possibilities. Among the diverse applications of AM, construction applications have not yet seen a commercially available and widely used product in the market. Nevertheless, it has been a subject of interest to researchers in recent decades. There are evident challenges and risks for the integration of AM towards large-scale construction. Therefore, progress in their commercialization seems to proceed at a slow pace, as only a few 3DP trials for large-scale construction can be found in the literature. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive and evidence-based baseline along with progresses in relevant disciplines related to 3DP in construction, which will provide an opportunity to experts in all domains to understand the multi-dimensional constraints and to specify the future research directions in these sectors. The distinct merit of this article is that it provides, for the first time, a diverse review on literature in the field of construction 3D printing. It offers up-to-date and in-depth information of hindrances (from processes, materials, structural design and standards) which add up towards low pace of automation in construction sector, identify deficiencies in the current research and provides future research trends for researchers. The findings from intensive literature review will guide engineers, designers and investors from construction sector to grab research gaps and business opportunities. First of all, the development of different 3DP processes in built environment are presented to highlight the process constraints along with the commercial applications of these processes for industrialists and investors to identify the business opportunities. Secondly, process parameters and difficulties in optimization of material mixtures are presented as a guide to civil engineers following the discussion on materials urging the need for development of eco-efficient and environment friendly materials. Conclusions drawn from discussion in individual sections along with issues/constraints and challenges involved are explained separately.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gibson, I., Rosen, D., & Stucker, B. (2015) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3 · Cited by 3,299
Additive Manufacturing Technologies: Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing
Gibson, I., Rosen, D. W., & Stucker, B. (2010) · National University of Singapore · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1120-9 · Cited by 2,969
3D printing using concrete extrusion: A roadmap for research
Buswell, R. A., Leal de Silva, W. R., Jones, S. Z., & Dirrenberger, J. (2018) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.006 · Cited by 1,604
A review on basalt fibre and its composites
Fiore, V., Scalici, T., Di Bella, G., & Valenza, A. (2015) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.12.034 · Cited by 1,336
Bos, F., Wolfs, R., Ahmed, Z., & Salet, T. (2016) · Virtual and Physical Prototyping · doi:10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867 · Cited by 1,257
Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete
Le, T. T., Austin, S. A., Lim, S., Buswell, R. A., Gibb, A. G. F., & Thorpe, T. (2012) · Materials and Structures · doi:10.1617/s11527-012-9828-z · Cited by 1,218
Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes
Lim, S., Buswell, R. A., Le, T. T., Austin, S. A., Gibb, A. G. F., & Thorpe, T. (2012) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.010 · Cited by 1,205
Rheological requirements for printable concretes
Roussel, N. (2018) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.005 · Cited by 1,203
Automated construction by contour crafting—related robotics and information technologies
Khoshnevis, B. (2004) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2003.08.012 · Cited by 1,161
Vision of 3D printing with concrete — Technical, economic and environmental potentials
De Schutter, G., Lesage, K., Mechtcherine, V., Nerella, V. N., Habert, G., & Agusti-Juan, I. (2018) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.06.001 · Cited by 1,072
Cited by
Recent advancements of robotics in construction
Xiao, B., Chen, C., & Yin, X. (2022) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104591 · Cited by 204
Additive Manufacturing of Carbon Using Commodity Polypropylene
Smith, P., Obando, A. G., Griffin, A., Robertson, M., Bounds, E., & Qiang, Z. (2023) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202208029 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Al Rashid, A., Khan, S. A., G. Al-Ghamdi, S., & Koç, M.
- Venue
- Automation in Construction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 118
- Pages
- 103268
- ISSN
- 0926-5805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3037610145
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 94
- FWCI
- 15.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Additive manufacturing: Technology, applications, markets, and opportunities for the built environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103268
- The paper
- Al Rashid, A., Khan, S. A., G. Al-Ghamdi, S., & Koç, M. (2020). Additive manufacturing: Technology, applications, markets, and opportunities for the built environment. Automation in Construction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103268
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.